These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35262097)

  • 21. Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 μm × 20 μm microfluidic flow channels.
    Gong H; Bickham BP; Woolley AT; Nordin GP
    Lab Chip; 2017 Aug; 17(17):2899-2909. PubMed ID: 28726927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Low-cost, versatile, and highly reproducible microfabrication pipeline to generate 3D-printed customised cell culture devices with complex designs.
    Hagemann C; Bailey MCD; Carraro E; Stankevich KS; Lionello VM; Khokhar N; Suklai P; Moreno-Gonzalez C; O'Toole K; Konstantinou G; Dix CL; Joshi S; Giagnorio E; Bergholt MS; Spicer CD; Imbert A; Tedesco FS; Serio A
    PLoS Biol; 2024 Mar; 22(3):e3002503. PubMed ID: 38478490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pharmaceutical applications and requirements of resins for printing by digital light processing (DLP).
    Uchida DT; Bruschi ML
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2024 Jun; 29(5):445-456. PubMed ID: 38641968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Emerging Technologies and Materials for High-Resolution 3D Printing of Microfluidic Chips.
    Kotz F; Helmer D; Rapp BE
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2022; 179():37-66. PubMed ID: 32797271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sealing 3D-printed parts to poly(dimethylsiloxane) for simple fabrication of Microfluidic devices.
    Carrell CS; McCord CP; Wydallis RM; Henry CS
    Anal Chim Acta; 2020 Aug; 1124():78-84. PubMed ID: 32534678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 3D Printing of Individualized Microfluidic Chips with DLP-Based Printer.
    Qiu J; Li J; Guo Z; Zhang Y; Nie B; Qi G; Zhang X; Zhang J; Wei R
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Oct; 16(21):. PubMed ID: 37959581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanically tunable resins based on acrylate-based resin for digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing.
    Pongwisuthiruchte A; Dubas ST; Aumnate C; Potiyaraj P
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20025. PubMed ID: 36414680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical properties, accuracy, and cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D printing resins composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA.
    Lin CH; Lin YM; Lai YL; Lee SY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):349-354. PubMed ID: 31202550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
    Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3D Printed Microfluidics.
    Nielsen AV; Beauchamp MJ; Nordin GP; Woolley AT
    Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif); 2020 Jun; 13(1):45-65. PubMed ID: 31821017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tunable resins with PDMS-like elastic modulus for stereolithographic 3D-printing of multimaterial microfluidic actuators.
    Ahmadianyazdi A; Miller IJ; Folch A
    Lab Chip; 2023 Sep; 23(18):4019-4032. PubMed ID: 37584639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Non-Cytotoxic Resin for Micro-Stereolithography for Cell Cultures of HUVECs.
    Männel MJ; Fischer C; Thiele J
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32111058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimization of photocrosslinkable resin components and 3D printing process parameters.
    Guerra AJ; Lammel-Lindemann J; Katko A; Kleinfehn A; Rodriguez CA; Catalani LH; Becker ML; Ciurana J; Dean D
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Oct; 97():154-161. PubMed ID: 31352105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms.
    Macdonald NP; Cabot JM; Smejkal P; Guijt RM; Paull B; Breadmore MC
    Anal Chem; 2017 Apr; 89(7):3858-3866. PubMed ID: 28281349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optical Approach to Resin Formulation for 3D Printed Microfluidics.
    Gong H; Beauchamp M; Perry S; Woolley AT; Nordin GP
    RSC Adv; 2015 Dec; 5(129):106621-106632. PubMed ID: 26744624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recent Trends in Advanced Photoinitiators for Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing.
    Bao Y
    Macromol Rapid Commun; 2022 Jul; 43(14):e2200202. PubMed ID: 35579565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Photopolymerizable Resins for 3D-Printing Solid-Cured Tissue Engineered Implants.
    Guerra AJ; Lara-Padilla H; Becker ML; Rodriguez CA; Dean D
    Curr Drug Targets; 2019; 20(8):823-838. PubMed ID: 30648506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding and improving FDM 3D printing to fabricate high-resolution and optically transparent microfluidic devices.
    Quero RF; Domingos da Silveira G; Fracassi da Silva JA; Jesus DP
    Lab Chip; 2021 Sep; 21(19):3715-3729. PubMed ID: 34355724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 3D-Printed Microfluidic Devices for Enhanced Online Sampling and Direct Optical Measurements.
    Monia Kabandana GK; Jones CG; Sharifi SK; Chen C
    ACS Sens; 2020 Jul; 5(7):2044-2051. PubMed ID: 32363857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hydrogel-Assisted Double Molding Enables Rapid Replication of Stereolithographic 3D Prints for Engineered Tissue Design.
    Simmons DW; Schuftan DR; Ramahdita G; Huebsch N
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 May; 15(21):25313-25323. PubMed ID: 37200617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.