197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35263546)
1. Clinical Cutoff Scores for Acoustic Indices of Vocal Hyperfunction That Combine Relative Fundamental Frequency and Cepstral Peak Prominence.
Kapsner-Smith MR; Díaz-Cádiz ME; Vojtech JM; Buckley DP; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Tracy LF; Noordzij JP; Eadie TL; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1349-1369. PubMed ID: 35263546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative Fundamental Frequency Distinguishes Between Phonotraumatic and Non-Phonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.
Heller Murray ES; Lien YS; Van Stan JH; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Pieter Noordzij J; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 28595317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in Daily Voice Use Measures Between Female Patients With Nonphonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction and Matched Controls.
Van Stan JH; Ortiz AJ; Cortes JP; Marks KL; Toles LE; Mehta DD; Burns JA; Hron T; Stadelman-Cohen T; Krusemark C; Muise J; Fox-Galalis AB; Nudelman C; Zeitels S; Hillman RE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 May; 64(5):1457-1470. PubMed ID: 33900807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.
Brockmann-Bauser M; Van Stan JH; Carvalho Sampaio M; Bohlender JE; Hillman RE; Mehta DD
J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):411-417. PubMed ID: 31859213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset.
Stepp CE; Sawin DE; Eadie TL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1887-96. PubMed ID: 22615477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.
Park Y; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1707-1718. PubMed ID: 31181173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the Clinical Utility of Relative Fundamental Frequency as an Objective Measure of Vocal Hyperfunction.
Roy N; Fetrow RA; Merrill RM; Dromey C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 59(5):1002-1017. PubMed ID: 27768175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-Reported Factors Associated with the Onset of Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.
Kridgen S; Hillman RE; Stadelman-Cohen T; Zeitels S; Burns JA; Hron T; Krusemark C; Muise J; Van Stan JH
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Apr; 130(4):389-394. PubMed ID: 32909443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glottal Aerodynamics Estimated From Neck-Surface Vibration in Women With Phonotraumatic and Nonphonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.
Espinoza VM; Mehta DD; Van Stan JH; Hillman RE; Zañartu M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):2861-2869. PubMed ID: 32755502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated Relative Fundamental Frequency Algorithms for Use With Neck-Surface Accelerometer Signals.
Groll MD; Vojtech JM; Hablani S; Mehta DD; Buckley DP; Noordzij JP; Stepp CE
J Voice; 2022 Mar; 36(2):156-169. PubMed ID: 32653267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of voice therapy on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset in patients with vocal hyperfunction.
Stepp CE; Merchant GR; Heaton JT; Hillman RE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1260-6. PubMed ID: 21498578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cepstral and Perceptual Investigations in Female Teachers With Functionally Healthy Voice.
Phadke KV; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Kankare E; Geneid A; Švec JG
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):485.e33-485.e43. PubMed ID: 30342798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.
Stone D; McCabe P; Palme CE; Heard R; Eastwood C; Riffat F; Madill C
J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 25301299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lombard Effect in Individuals With Nonphonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction: Impact on Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Vocal Fold Vibratory Parameters.
Castro C; Prado P; Espinoza VM; Testart A; Marfull D; Manriquez R; Stepp CE; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Zañartu M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):2881-2895. PubMed ID: 35930680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Voice Relative Fundamental Frequency Via Neck-Skin Acceleration in Individuals With Voice Disorders.
Lien YA; Calabrese CR; Michener CM; Murray EH; Van Stan JH; Mehta DD; Hillman RE; Noordzij JP; Stepp CE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 58(5):1482-7. PubMed ID: 26134171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Adventitious Acute Vocal Trauma: Relative Fundamental Frequency and Listener Perception.
Murray ES; Hands GL; Calabrese CR; Stepp CE
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 26028369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cepstral analysis in patients with a vocal fold motility impairment: advantages of the cepstrum over time-based acoustic analysis.
Delgado-Vargas B; Acle-Cervera L; Sánz-López L; Bonet-Loscertales M; Pérez-Naranjo N; Fuentes-Navajo P
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 278(1):173-179. PubMed ID: 32839861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship Between Laryngeal Signs and Symptoms, Acoustic Measures, and Quality of Life in Finnish Primary and Kindergarten School Teachers.
Munier C; Brockmann-Bauser M; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Kankare E; Geneid A
J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):259-271. PubMed ID: 30691965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
