These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35263546)

  • 41. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
    Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cepstral Measures to Analyze Vocal Fatigue in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorder.
    Mahalingam S; Boominathan P; Arunachalam R; Venkatesh L; Srinivas S
    J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):815-821. PubMed ID: 32184054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cepstral measures in the assessment of severity of voice disorders.
    Lopes LW; Sousa ESDS; Silva ACFD; Silva IMD; Paiva MAA; Vieira VJD; Almeida AA
    Codas; 2019 Aug; 31(4):e20180175. PubMed ID: 31433040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Voice Quality in Laryngeal Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study of the Effect of Voice Rehabilitation.
    Millgård M; Tuomi L
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):486.e13-486.e22. PubMed ID: 32389236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of Habitual and High Pitch Phonation in Teachers With and Without Vocal Fatigue.
    Thomas SA; Maruthy S
    J Voice; 2022 Jan; 36(1):141.e1-141.e9. PubMed ID: 32417040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.
    McKenna VS; Stepp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1643. PubMed ID: 30424674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index.
    Maryn Y; Weenink D
    J Voice; 2015 Jan; 29(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 25499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Relationship Between Relative Fundamental Frequency and a Kinematic Estimate of Laryngeal Stiffness in Healthy Adults.
    McKenna VS; Heller Murray ES; Lien YS; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1283-1294. PubMed ID: 27936279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Voice Acoustic Parameters as Predictors of Depression.
    Silva WJ; Lopes L; Galdino MKC; Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2024 Jan; 38(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 34353686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Impact of Communication Modality on Voice Production.
    Tracy LF; Segina RK; Cadiz MD; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):2913-2920. PubMed ID: 32762517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) Voice Analysis in Iranian Post-lingual Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aghaei F; Khoramshahi H; Zamani P; Dehqan A; Hesam S
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):795.e11-795.e20. PubMed ID: 34857450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Changes in Relative Fundamental Frequency Under Increased Cognitive Load in Individuals With Healthy Voices.
    Dahl KL; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 33788635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Differences in Weeklong Ambulatory Vocal Behavior Between Female Patients With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Controls.
    Van Stan JH; Mehta DD; Ortiz AJ; Burns JA; Toles LE; Marks KL; Vangel M; Hron T; Zeitels S; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 63(2):372-384. PubMed ID: 31995428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
    Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
    J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Michael DD; Goding GS
    J Voice; 2002 Mar; 16(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 12008652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Individual Monitoring of Vocal Effort With Relative Fundamental Frequency: Relationships With Aerodynamics and Listener Perception.
    Lien YA; Michener CM; Eadie TL; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):566-75. PubMed ID: 25675090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
    Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of Cognitive Stress on Voice Acoustics in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.
    Dahl KL; Stepp CE
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2023 Jan; 32(1):264-274. PubMed ID: 36516470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Towards a Singing Voice Multi-Sensor Analysis Tool: System Design, and Assessment Based on Vocal Breathiness.
    Angelakis E; Kotsani N; Georgaki A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34884019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Investigating the cepstral acoustic characteristics of voice in healthy children.
    Demirci AN; Köse A; Aydinli FE; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 148():110815. PubMed ID: 34217000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.