BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35263645)

  • 1. Ultrasound Correlates Highly With Cross Sectional Imaging for Small Renal Masses in a Contemporary Cohort.
    Kim SSY; Breau R; Mallick R; Kapoor A; Finelli A; Pouliot F; Tanguay S; Fairey A; Bhindi B; Lavallee L; So A; Rendon R
    Urology; 2022 Jul; 165():212-217. PubMed ID: 35263645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is ultrasound imaging inferior to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating renal mass size?
    Mucksavage P; Ramchandani P; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
    Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 22202542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging for active surveillance of small renal masses.
    Bertelli E; Palombella A; Sessa F; Baldi I; Morelli N; Verna S; Greco I; Morselli S; Pili A; Sebastianelli A; Berni A; Nicoletti R; Minervini A; Carini M; Gacci M; Miele V; Agostini S; Serni S; Campi R
    World J Urol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):2853-2860. PubMed ID: 33495864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in Renal Tumor Size Measurements for Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Patients on Active Surveillance.
    Khan I; Beksac AT; Paulucci DJ; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Badani KK
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1275-1278. PubMed ID: 28799884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of small renal masses in real practice: sensitivity and specificity according to subjective radiologic interpretation.
    Kim JH; Sun HY; Hwang J; Hong SS; Cho YJ; Doo SW; Yang WJ; Song YS
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 14(1):260. PubMed ID: 27729042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the modified Bosniak classification system to risk stratify pediatric cystic renal masses: An international, multi-site study from the pediatric urologic oncology working group of the societies for pediatric urology.
    Peard L; Gargollo P; Grant C; Strine A; De Loof M; Sinatti C; Spinoit AF; Hoebeke P; Cost NG; Rehfuss A; Alpert SA; Cranford W; Dugan AJ; Saltzman AF
    J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Apr; 18(2):180.e1-180.e7. PubMed ID: 34961708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Epidemiology and diagnostic assessment of small renal masses].
    Ziegelmüller BK; Spek A; Szabados B; Casuscelli J; Clevert DA; Staehler M
    Urologe A; 2018 Mar; 57(3):274-279. PubMed ID: 29460170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adequacy of Unenhanced MRI for Surveillance of Small (Clinical T1a) Solid Renal Masses.
    Mawi H; Narine R; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):960-966. PubMed ID: 33594909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Growth kinetics of small renal mass: Initial analysis of active surveillance registry.
    Park SW; Lee SS; Lee DH; Nam JK; Chung MK
    Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Nov; 58(6):429-433. PubMed ID: 29124242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renal mass size: concordance between pathology and radiology.
    Kathrins M; Caesar S; Mucksavage P; Guzzo T
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Sep; 23(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 23778129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MRI and CT in the follow-up after irreversible electroporation of small renal masses.
    Buijs M; de Bruin DM; Wagstaff PG; J Zondervan P; Scheltema MJ; W Engelbrecht M; P Laguna M; van Lienden KP
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Sep; 27(5):654-663. PubMed ID: 34559050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation.
    Jamis-Dow CA; Choyke PL; Jennings SB; Linehan WM; Thakore KN; Walther MM
    Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 8628872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of radiographical imaging modalities for measuring the diameter of renal masses: is there a sizeable difference?
    Mucksavage P; Kutikov A; Magerfleisch L; Van Arsdalen K; Wein AJ; Ramchandani P; Malkowicz SB
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E232-6. PubMed ID: 21348913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of
    Su ZT; Patel HD; Huang MM; Meyer AR; Pavlovich CP; Pierorazio PM; Javadi MS; Allaf ME; Rowe SP; Gorin MA
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):827-834. PubMed ID: 32115400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Scan (CEUS) and MRI in the follow-up of cryoablation for small renal tumors. Experience on 25 cases.
    Zeccolini G; Del Biondo D; Cicero C; Casarin A; Guarise A; Celia A
    Urologia; 2014; 81 Suppl 23():S1-8. PubMed ID: 24665032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visceral adiposity and inflammatory bowel disease.
    Rowan CR; McManus J; Boland K; O'Toole A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 36(11):2305-2319. PubMed ID: 34104989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
    Wei SP; Xu CL; Zhang Q; Zhang QR; Zhao YE; Huang PF; Xie YD; Zhou CS; Tian FL; Yang B
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2135-2145. PubMed ID: 28331942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging in Suspected Renal-Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review.
    Vogel C; Ziegelmüller B; Ljungberg B; Bensalah K; Bex A; Canfield S; Giles RH; Hora M; Kuczyk MA; Merseburger AS; Powles T; Albiges L; Stewart F; Volpe A; Graser A; Schlemmer M; Yuan C; Lam T; Staehler M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Apr; 17(2):e345-e355. PubMed ID: 30528378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of body composition in renal cell carcinoma patients: Comparing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements.
    Higgins MI; Martini DJ; Patil DH; Steele S; Evans S; Petrinec BP; Psutka SP; Sekhar A; Bilen MA; Master VA
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109307. PubMed ID: 33010681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new technique to characterize suspected renal transplant malignancies in renal transplant patients in comparison to standard imaging modalities.
    Mueller-Peltzer K; Negrão de Figueiredo G; Fischereder M; Habicht A; Rübenthaler J; Clevert DA
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 69(1-2):69-75. PubMed ID: 29630539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.