These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Calcification in pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital radiography. Fraser RG; Hickey NM; Niklason LT; Sabbagh EA; Luna RF; Alexander CB; Robinson CA; Katzenstein AL; Barnes GT Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 3526399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study. Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. Fischbach F; Freund T; Röttgen R; Engert U; Felix R; Ricke J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 14627567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential value of digital radiography. Preliminary observations on the use of dual-energy subtraction in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Fraser RG; Barnes GT; Hickey N; Luna R; Katzenstein A; Alexander B; McElvein R; Zorn G; Sabbagh E; Robinson CA Chest; 1986 Apr; 89(4 Suppl):249S-252S. PubMed ID: 3514175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of calcification in pulmonary nodules using bone images obtained with single exposure energy subtraction]. Kobayashi T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 55(9):638-45. PubMed ID: 7478948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved detection of small lung cancers with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. Li F; Engelmann R; Doi K; MacMahon H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):886-91. PubMed ID: 18356433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications. Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Koenker RM; Tillotson CL; Pearsen KD; Hill JW; Velaj RH Invest Radiol; 1989 Jul; 24(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 2753645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: what to look for beyond calcified nodules. Kuhlman JE; Collins J; Brooks GN; Yandow DR; Broderick LS Radiographics; 2006; 26(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16418245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy digital radiographic quantification of calcium in simulated pulmonary nodules. Hickey NM; Niklason LT; Sabbagh E; Fraser RG; Barnes GT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jan; 148(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 3491513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual energy film subtraction technique for detecting calcification in solitary pulmonary nodules. Kruger RA; Armstrong JD; Sorenson JA; Niklason LT Radiology; 1981 Jul; 140(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 7017812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Usefulness of temporal subtraction images of chest computed radiography for detection of metastatic pulmonary nodules]. Uozumi T; Nakamura K; Takahashi H; Okazaki H; Kamada K; Kakeda S; Nakata H; Oda N; Katsuragawa S; Doi K Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Mar; 60(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 10774180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of dual-energy and conventional chest radiography for nodule detection. Ho JT; Kruger RA Invest Radiol; 1989 Nov; 24(11):861-8. PubMed ID: 2807801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography. MacMahon H; Li F; Engelmann R; Roberts R; Armato S J Thorac Imaging; 2008 May; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 18520564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Digital image intensifier radiography and film-screen combinations in pulmonary nodules]. Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Jenett M Rofo; 1989 Aug; 151(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 2548236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metastatic calcification of the heart and lungs in end-stage renal disease: detection and quantification by dual-energy digital chest radiography. Sanders C; Frank MS; Rostand SG; Rutsky EA; Barnes GT; Fraser RG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Nov; 149(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 3499790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. Chakraborty DP; Breatnach ES; Yester MV; Soto B; Barnes GT; Fraser RG Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3940394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]