191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35264184)
1. Quantification of biological range uncertainties in patients treated at the Krakow proton therapy centre.
Garbacz M; Gajewski J; Durante M; Kisielewicz K; Krah N; Kopeć R; Olko P; Patera V; Rinaldi I; Rydygier M; Schiavi A; Scifoni E; Skóra T; Skrzypek A; Tommasino F; Rucinski A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Mar; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 35264184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative photon and proton dosimetry for patients with mediastinal lymphoma in the era of Monte Carlo treatment planning and variable relative biological effectiveness.
Tseng YD; Maes SM; Kicska G; Sponsellor P; Traneus E; Wong T; Stewart RD; Saini J
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 31888769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study of relationship between dose, LET and the risk of brain necrosis after proton therapy for skull base tumors.
Garbacz M; Cordoni FG; Durante M; Gajewski J; Kisielewicz K; Krah N; Kopeć R; Olko P; Patera V; Rinaldi I; Rydygier M; Schiavi A; Scifoni E; Skóra T; Tommasino F; Rucinski A
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Oct; 163():143-149. PubMed ID: 34461183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.
Unkelbach J; Botas P; Giantsoudi D; Gorissen BL; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Dec; 96(5):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 27869082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can differences in linear energy transfer and thus relative biological effectiveness compromise the dosimetric advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy as compared to passively scattered proton therapy?
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald S; Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 29726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.
Liu W; Mohan R; Park P; Liu Z; Li H; Li X; Li Y; Wu R; Sahoo N; Dong L; Zhu XR; Grosshans DR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(6):384-91. PubMed ID: 25407859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Relative to Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Increased Vertebral Column Sparing in Craniospinal Irradiation in Growing Pediatric Patients.
Giantsoudi D; Seco J; Eaton BR; Simeone FJ; Kooy H; Yock TI; Tarbell NJ; DeLaney TF; Adams J; Paganetti H; MacDonald SM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 May; 98(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28587051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interlaced proton grid therapy - Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions.
Henry T; Ödén J
Phys Med; 2018 Dec; 56():81-89. PubMed ID: 30473384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Underwood T; Giantsoudi D; Moteabbed M; Zietman A; Efstathiou J; Paganetti H; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 27084660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment-related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors.
Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Witt Nyström P; Traneus E; Dasu A
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 31705671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of proton LET/RBE modeling and robustness analysis on base-of-skull and pediatric craniopharyngioma proton plans relative to VMAT.
Gutierrez A; Rompokos V; Li K; Gillies C; D'Souza D; Solda F; Fersht N; Chang YC; Royle G; Amos RA; Underwood T
Acta Oncol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):1765-1774. PubMed ID: 31429359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors in intensity modulated proton therapy plans of small and large volume tumors.
Arjunan M; Krishnan G; Sharma DS; M P N; Patro KC; Thiyagarajan R; Srinivas C; Jalali R
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20201031. PubMed ID: 33529057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reformulated McNamara RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Gu W; Ruan D; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2136-2149. PubMed ID: 35181892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hyperfractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy for pharyngeal cancer with variable relative biological effectiveness: A simulation study.
Kasamatsu K; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Miyazaki K; Takao S; Tamura M; Otsuka M; Uchinami Y; Aoyama H
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7815-7825. PubMed ID: 36300598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear energy transfer-guided optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy: feasibility study and clinical potential.
Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Craft D; Niemierko A; Trofimov A; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23790771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
