258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35264310)
1. Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Ramai D; Ofosu A; Muscatiello N; Mangiavillano B; Lamonaca L; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Gkolfakis P; Stasi E; Samanta J; Dhar J; Cotsoglou C; Castillo JL; Antonini F
Dig Liver Dis; 2022 May; 54(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 35264310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm).
Sekine M; Miura T; Fujiwara J; Uehara T; Asano T; Matsumoto S; Miyatani H; Mashima H
J Ultrasound; 2022 Mar; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33511507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review.
Verloop CA; Goos JAC; Bruno MJ; Quispel R; van Driel LMJW; Hol L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):895-911.e13. PubMed ID: 38360118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles.
Mangiavillano B; Spatola F; Facciorusso A; De Nucci G; Ligresti D; Henry Eusebi L; Lisotti A; Auriemma F; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Crinò S; Scarlata S; Troncone E; Del Vecchio Blanco G; Manes G; Traina M; Bertani A; Ofosu A; Binda C; Fabbri C; Muscatiello N; Fusaroli P; Repici A; Carrara S
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jul; 34(7):757-762. PubMed ID: 35482928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration for Tissue Sampling of Abdominal Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparative Study.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N; Gkolfakis P; Samanta J; Londoño Castillo J; Cotsoglou C; Ramai D
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
Mangiavillano B; Crinò SF; Facciorusso A; Di Matteo F; Barbera C; Larghi A; Rizzatti G; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Auriemma F; Fabbri C; Binda C; Coluccio C; Marocchi G; Staiano T; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Eusebi LH; Cirota GG; De Nucci G; Stigliano S; Manes G; Bonanno G; Ofosu A; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Spatola F; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 36044915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
Levine I; Trindade AJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(26):4194-4207. PubMed ID: 34326619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography plus fine needle aspirartion and fine needle biopsy in pelvic masses.
Auriemma F; Dabizzi E; Facciorusso A; Carrara S; de Nucci G; Manes G; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Ofosu A; Crinò SF; Repici A; Mangiavillano B
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 35(2):153-158. PubMed ID: 36574305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathological comparison of aspiration and biopsy needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with subepithelial lesions.
Watanabe M; Okuwaki K; Kida M; Tadehara M; Adachi K; Masutani H; Tamaki A; Imaizumi H; Iwai T; Yamauchi H; Kaneko T; Hasegawa R; Kurosu T; Koizumi W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 49(7):856-863. PubMed ID: 33885229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Using 22-Gauge Franseen Needle for the Histological Diagnosis of Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Prospective Pilot Study.
Mita N; Iwashita T; Uemura S; Iwasa Y; Toda K; Mukai T; Miyazaki T; Yasuda I; Shimizu M
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Apr; 65(4):1155-1163. PubMed ID: 31531819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
