These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35264520)

  • 1. [Important Points at Interpretation ofNongenotoxic-Carcinogenicity Induced by Pesticidesin Rodent Bioassays].
    Satoh H; Machino S; Fujii T; Yoshida M; Asano S; Yokoyama Y; Miyajima K
    Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2022; 63(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 35264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rethinking chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity assessment for agrochemicals project (ReCAAP): A reporting framework to support a weight of evidence safety assessment without long-term rodent bioassays.
    Hilton GM; Adcock C; Akerman G; Baldassari J; Battalora M; Casey W; Clippinger AJ; Cope R; Goetz A; Hayes AW; Papineni S; Peffer RC; Ramsingh D; Williamson Riffle B; Sanches da Rocha M; Ryan N; Scollon E; Visconti N; Wolf DC; Yan Z; Lowit A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jun; 131():105160. PubMed ID: 35311659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards achieving a modern science-based paradigm for agrochemical carcinogenicity assessment.
    Hilton GM; Corvi R; Luijten M; Mehta J; Wolf DC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jan; 137():105301. PubMed ID: 36436696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rodent carcinogens: setting priorities.
    Gold LS; Slone TH; Stern BR; Manley NB; Ames BN
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5080):261-5. PubMed ID: 1411524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection.
    Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing chemical carcinogenicity: hazard identification, classification, and risk assessment. Insight from a Toxicology Forum state-of-the-science workshop.
    Felter SP; Bhat VS; Botham PA; Bussard DA; Casey W; Hayes AW; Hilton GM; Magurany KA; Sauer UG; Ohanian EV
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2021 Sep; 51(8):653-694. PubMed ID: 35239444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of mammalian carcinogenicity study design and potential effects of alternate test procedures on the safety evaluation of food ingredients.
    Hayes AW; Dayan AD; Hall WC; Kodell RL; Williams GM; Waddell WD; Slesinski RS; Kruger CL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Jun; 60(1 Suppl):S1-34. PubMed ID: 21094668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An enhanced thirteen-week bioassay as an alternative for screening for carcinogenesis factors.
    Cohen SM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 20593920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo transgenic bioassays and assessment of the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals.
    Contrera JF; DeGeorge JJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Feb; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):71-80. PubMed ID: 9539006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens.
    Ashby J
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Mar; 15(3):183-202. PubMed ID: 8839204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathologists' perspective on the study design, analysis, and interpretation of proliferative lesions in a lifetime rodent carcinogenicity bioassay of sucralose.
    Elmore SA; Rehg JE; Schoeb TR; Everitt JI; Bolon B
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2024 Jun; 188():114524. PubMed ID: 38428799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratification of rodent carcinogenicity bioassay results to reflect relative human hazard.
    Tennant RW
    Mutat Res; 1993 Mar; 286(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 7678907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
    Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How well can in vitro data predict in vivo effects of chemicals? Rodent carcinogenicity as a case study.
    Anthony Tony Cox L; Popken DA; Kaplan AM; Plunkett LM; Becker RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():54-64. PubMed ID: 26879462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2-year rodent bioassay in drug and chemical carcinogenicity testing: Performance, utility, and configuration for cancer hazard identification.
    Suarez-Torres JD; Orozco CA; Ciangherotti CE
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2021; 110():107070. PubMed ID: 33905862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Case analysis of kinetics investigations in toxicity studies of pesticides to identify the nonlinearity of internal exposure and the influences of nonlinearity on the toxicological interpretation of pesticide residue.
    Machino S; Yokoyama Y; Egawa T; Satoh H; Miyajima K; Yoshida M; Asano S; Ozawa S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Aug; 124():104958. PubMed ID: 33991633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk of organochlorine pesticide residues in processed cereal-based complementary foods for infants and young children in Ghana.
    Akoto O; Oppong-Otoo J; Osei-Fosu P
    Chemosphere; 2015 Aug; 132():193-9. PubMed ID: 25889270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.