These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35264661)

  • 1. An imputation approach using subdistribution weights for deep survival analysis with competing events.
    Gorgi Zadeh S; Behning C; Schmid M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3815. PubMed ID: 35264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard.
    Donoghoe MW; Gebski V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28376736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subdistribution hazard models for competing risks in discrete time.
    Berger M; Schmid M; Welchowski T; Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Beyersmann J
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 30418529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints.
    Tai BC; Wee J; Machin D
    Trials; 2011 May; 12():127. PubMed ID: 21595883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep Survival Machines: Fully Parametric Survival Regression and Representation Learning for Censored Data With Competing Risks.
    Nagpal C; Li X; Dubrawski A
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 33460387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nomogram for survival analysis in the presence of competing risks.
    Zhang Z; Geskus RB; Kattan MW; Zhang H; Liu T
    Ann Transl Med; 2017 Oct; 5(20):403. PubMed ID: 29152503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ignoring competing events in the analysis of survival data may lead to biased results: a nonmathematical illustration of competing risk analysis.
    Schuster NA; Hoogendijk EO; Kok AAL; Twisk JWR; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():42-48. PubMed ID: 32165133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring.
    Geskus RB
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20377575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis.
    Beyersmann J; Latouche A; Buchholz A; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(6):956-71. PubMed ID: 19125387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-dependent covariates in the proportional subdistribution hazards model for competing risks.
    Beyersmann J; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):765-76. PubMed ID: 18434297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tree-based models for survival data with competing risks.
    Kretowska M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():185-198. PubMed ID: 29650312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of accelerated failure time data with dependent censoring using auxiliary variables via nonparametric multiple imputation.
    Hsu CH; Taylor JM; Hu C
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2768-80. PubMed ID: 25999295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proportional subdistribution hazards modeling offers a summary analysis, even if misspecified.
    Grambauer N; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):875-84. PubMed ID: 20213713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data.
    Austin PC; Fine JP
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4391-4400. PubMed ID: 28913837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semiparametric accelerated failure time cure rate mixture models with competing risks.
    Choi S; Zhu L; Huang X
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 28983935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Boosting for high-dimensional time-to-event data with competing risks.
    Binder H; Allignol A; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(7):890-6. PubMed ID: 19244389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semiparametric competing risks regression under interval censoring using the R package intccr.
    Park J; Bakoyannis G; Yiannoutsos CT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 May; 173():167-176. PubMed ID: 31046992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PSHREG: a SAS macro for proportional and nonproportional subdistribution hazards regression.
    Kohl M; Plischke M; Leffondré K; Heinze G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Feb; 118(2):218-33. PubMed ID: 25572709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Modeling Approaches for Discrete Event Simulations With Competing Risks Based on Censored Individual Patient Data: A Simulation Study and Illustration in Colorectal Cancer.
    Degeling K; IJzerman MJ; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM; Franken MD; Koopman M; Clements MS; Koffijberg H
    Value Health; 2022 Jan; 25(1):104-115. PubMed ID: 35031089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regularized Weighted Nonparametric Likelihood Approach for High-Dimension Sparse Subdistribution Hazards Model for Competing Risk Data.
    Tapak L; Kosorok MR; Sadeghifar M; Hamidi O; Afshar S; Doosti H
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():5169052. PubMed ID: 34589136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.