214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35267466)
41. Feasibility of fully automated classification of whole slide images based on deep learning.
Cho KO; Lee SH; Jang HJ
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol; 2020 Jan; 24(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 31908578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning for melanocytic lesions using whole-slide pathological images.
Ba W; Wang R; Yin G; Song Z; Zou J; Zhong C; Yang J; Yu G; Yang H; Zhang L; Li C
Transl Oncol; 2021 Sep; 14(9):101161. PubMed ID: 34192650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dual-path network with synergistic grouping loss and evidence driven risk stratification for whole slide cervical image analysis.
Lin H; Chen H; Wang X; Wang Q; Wang L; Heng PA
Med Image Anal; 2021 Apr; 69():101955. PubMed ID: 33588122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A deep learning model for the classification of indeterminate lung carcinoma in biopsy whole slide images.
Kanavati F; Toyokawa G; Momosaki S; Takeoka H; Okamoto M; Yamazaki K; Takeo S; Iizuka O; Tsuneki M
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8110. PubMed ID: 33854137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Learning binary and sparse permutation-invariant representations for fast and memory efficient whole slide image search.
Hemati S; Kalra S; Babaie M; Tizhoosh HR
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Aug; 162():107026. PubMed ID: 37267827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cervical cancer detection in pap smear whole slide images using convNet with transfer learning and progressive resizing.
Bhatt AR; Ganatra A; Kotecha K
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e348. PubMed ID: 33816998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Accuracy and Efficiency of Deep-Learning-Based Automation of Dual Stain Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Wentzensen N; Lahrmann B; Clarke MA; Kinney W; Tokugawa D; Poitras N; Locke A; Bartels L; Krauthoff A; Walker J; Zuna R; Grewal KK; Goldhoff PE; Kingery JD; Castle PE; Schiffman M; Lorey TS; Grabe N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Jan; 113(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32584382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Deep learning-based diagnosis of lung cancer using a nationwide respiratory cytology image set: improving accuracy and inter-observer variability.
Kim T; Chang H; Kim B; Yang J; Koo D; Lee J; Chang JW; Hwang G; Gong G; Cho NH; Yoo CW; Pyo JY; Chong Y
Am J Cancer Res; 2023; 13(11):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 38058836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening: An Experience From Pakistan.
Hashmi AA; Naz S; Ahmed O; Yaqeen SR; Irfan M; Asif MG; Kamal A; Faridi N
Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12293. PubMed ID: 33520497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Whole Slide Lung Cancer Image Analysis.
Wang X; Chen H; Gan C; Lin H; Dou Q; Tsougenis E; Huang Q; Cai M; Heng PA
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2020 Sep; 50(9):3950-3962. PubMed ID: 31484154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A deep learning model for gastric diffuse-type adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images.
Kanavati F; Tsuneki M
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20486. PubMed ID: 34650155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Analysis of Cytology Pap Smear Images Based on Ensemble Deep Learning Approach.
Alsalatie M; Alquran H; Mustafa WA; Mohd Yacob Y; Ali Alayed A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36428816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Our 2018 Cancer Cytopathology Young Investigator.
Faquin WC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):218-221. PubMed ID: 30951265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Detection on Cell Cancer Using the Deep Transfer Learning and Histogram Based Image Focus Quality Assessment.
Bhuiyan MR; Abdullah J
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Deep Learning-Based Classification of Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Subtypes from Whole-Slide Histopathology Images.
Song J; Im S; Lee SH; Jang HJ
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36359467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Deep learning for bone marrow cell detection and classification on whole-slide images.
Wang CW; Huang SC; Lee YC; Shen YJ; Meng SI; Gaol JL
Med Image Anal; 2022 Jan; 75():102270. PubMed ID: 34710655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A New Artificial Intelligence-Based Method for Identifying Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Ziehl-Neelsen Stain on Tissue.
Zurac S; Mogodici C; Poncu T; Trăscău M; Popp C; Nichita L; Cioplea M; Ceachi B; Sticlaru L; Cioroianu A; Busca M; Stefan O; Tudor I; Voicu A; Stanescu D; Mustatea P; Dumitru C; Bastian A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35741294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Classification of Melanocytic Lesions in Selected and Whole-Slide Images via Convolutional Neural Networks.
Hart SN; Flotte W; Norgan AP; Shah KK; Buchan ZR; Mounajjed T; Flotte TJ
J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():5. PubMed ID: 30972224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. MAVARIC - a comparison of automation-assisted and manual cervical screening: a randomised controlled trial.
Kitchener HC; Blanks R; Cubie H; Desai M; Dunn G; Legood R; Gray A; Sadique Z; Moss S;
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(3):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-170. PubMed ID: 21266159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
