These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3526839)

  • 1. Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients.
    Hilton SV; Leopold GR; Olson LK; Willson SA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Sep; 147(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 3526839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management.
    Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; Sutherland LK; Gold RH; Sarti D; King W
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 3306779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast sonography.
    Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 1899737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined mammographic-sonographic evaluation of breast masses.
    Teixidor HS; Kazam E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Mar; 128(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 402833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Real-time sonography in breast diagnosis. Indication and value].
    Hajek P; Wittich G; Kumpan W; Lechner G; Waneck R
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1984 Oct; 96(20):772-8. PubMed ID: 6098081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.
    Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time sonography of palpable breast masses.
    Hayashi N; Tamaki N; Yonekura Y; Senda M; Yamamoto K; Torizuka K; Hori T; Inamoto T; Ohgaki K; Kodama H
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):611-5. PubMed ID: 3893612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography.
    Buchberger W; Niehoff A; Obrist P; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Dünser M
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2000 Aug; 21(4):325-36. PubMed ID: 11014255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of mammography and automated sonography in 700 patients].
    Kessler M; Igl W; Krauss B; Bassermann R; Bohmert DH; Eiermann W; Lohe KJ; Lissner J
    Rofo; 1983 Mar; 138(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 6403428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast disease.
    Dash N; Lupetin AR; Daffner RH; Deeb ZL; Sefczek RJ; Schapiro RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jan; 146(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 3484399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated breast sonography using a 7.5-MHz PVDF transducer: preliminary clinical evaluation. Work in progress.
    Jackson VP; Kelly-Fry E; Rothschild PA; Holden RW; Clark SA
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):679-84. PubMed ID: 3517952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High frequency breast ultrasound. Hand-held versus automated units; examination for palpable mass versus screening.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH
    J Ultrasound Med; 1988 Feb; 7(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 3279228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sonography of malignant breast disease.
    Jackson VP
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1989 Apr; 10(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 2697327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improvement of preoperative evaluation of palpable, noncystic processes of the breast by echomammography].
    Leucht W; Rabe D; Müller A; von Fournier D; Humbert KD; Schmidt W
    Ultraschall Med; 1985 Feb; 6(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3887563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What ultrasonography can tell in breast masses that mammography and physical examination cannot.
    Rosner D; Blaird D
    J Surg Oncol; 1985 Apr; 28(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 3884906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human female breast. Current status and pathologic correlations.
    Powell DE; Stelling CB
    Pathol Annu; 1988; 23 Pt 1():159-94. PubMed ID: 2838793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Streaming detection for evaluation of indeterminate sonographic breast masses: a pilot study.
    Soo MS; Ghate SV; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Warwick BN; Ramachandran AR; Nightingale KR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 May; 186(5):1335-41. PubMed ID: 16632728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses by surgeons.
    Staren ED
    Ann Surg Oncol; 1996 Sep; 3(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 8876890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Palpable breast masses: evaluation by high frequency, hand-held real-time sonography and xeromammography. Work in progress.
    Fleischer AC; Muhletaler CA; Reynolds VH; Machin JE; Thieme GA; Bundy AL; Winfield AC; James AE
    Radiology; 1983 Sep; 148(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 6878706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.