These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35270622)

  • 1. Designing Environmental Messages to Discourage Red Meat Consumption: An Online Experiment.
    Wistar A; Hall MG; Bercholz M; Taillie LS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Health, Environmental, and Animal Welfare Messages Discouraging Red Meat Consumption: An Online Randomized Experiment.
    Grummon AH; Musicus AA; Salvia MG; Thorndike AN; Rimm EB
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2023 Mar; 123(3):466-476.e26. PubMed ID: 36223865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Awareness of and reactions to health and environmental harms of red meat among parents in the United States.
    Grummon AH; Goodman D; Jaacks LM; Taillie LS; Chauvenet CA; Salvia MG; Rimm EB
    Public Health Nutr; 2022 Apr; 25(4):893-903. PubMed ID: 34321133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing health and environmental warning messages about red meat: An online experiment.
    Taillie LS; Prestemon CE; Hall MG; Grummon AH; Vesely A; Jaacks LM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0268121. PubMed ID: 35749387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing front-of-package warnings to discourage red meat consumption: a randomized experiment with US meat consumers.
    Taillie LS; Chauvenet C; Grummon AH; Hall MG; Waterlander W; Prestemon CE; Jaacks LM
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Sep; 18(1):114. PubMed ID: 34493289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How effective are messages and their characteristics in changing behavioural intentions to substitute plant-based foods for red meat? The mediating role of prior beliefs.
    Vainio A; Irz X; Hartikainen H
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():217-224. PubMed ID: 29447995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When Less is better: Messages that Present Dietary Carbon Emissions Data at the individual (vs. Aggregate) Level Increase Commitment to Sustainable Beef Consumption.
    Aberman Y; Plaks J
    Appetite; 2022 Jul; 174():105980. PubMed ID: 35339621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who has a beef with reducing red and processed meat consumption? A media framing analysis.
    Sievert K; Lawrence M; Parker C; Russell CA; Baker P
    Public Health Nutr; 2022 Mar; 25(3):578-590. PubMed ID: 34588091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cooking at Home, Fast Food, Meat Consumption, and Dietary Carbon Footprint among US Adults.
    Wolfson JA; Willits-Smith AM; Leung CW; Heller MC; Rose D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35055675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Cognitive-Emotional Model to Explain Message Framing Effects: Reducing Meat Consumption.
    Carfora V; Pastore M; Catellani P
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():583209. PubMed ID: 33854457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions.
    Gutkowska K; Czarnecki J; Głąbska D; Guzek D; Batóg A
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2018; 69(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 30525333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health or environment? Understanding which informative message is more effective in replacing red meat with mushroom-based alternatives.
    De Cianni R; Mancuso T; Rizzo G; Migliore G
    Appetite; 2024 Aug; 199():107405. PubMed ID: 38723668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different Frames to Reduce Red Meat Intake: The Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy.
    Bertolotti M; Carfora V; Catellani P
    Health Commun; 2020 Apr; 35(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 30676108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loss framing effect on reducing excessive red and processed meat consumption: Evidence from Italy.
    Caso G; Rizzo G; Migliore G; Vecchio R
    Meat Sci; 2023 May; 199():109135. PubMed ID: 36796286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
    O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulatory Focus and the Effect of Nutritional Messages on Health and Well-Being: The Case of Red Meat Intake.
    Bertolotti M; Carfora V; Catellani P
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2020 Mar; 12(1):212-230. PubMed ID: 31454169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excessive red and processed meat intake: relations with health and environment in Brazil.
    Carvalho AM; Selem SS; Miranda AM; Marchioni DM
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Jun; 115(11):2011-6. PubMed ID: 27040312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meat consumption reduction in Italian regions: Health co-benefits and decreases in GHG emissions.
    Farchi S; De Sario M; Lapucci E; Davoli M; Michelozzi P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182960. PubMed ID: 28813467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental and Climate Impact Perceptions in University Students: Sustainability Motivations and Perceptions Correspond With Lower Red Meat Intake.
    Slotnick MJ; Falbe J; Cohen JFW; Gearhardt AN; Wolfson JA; Leung CW
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2023 May; 123(5):740-750. PubMed ID: 36150669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two Birds, One Stone: The Effectiveness of Health and Environmental Messages to Reduce Meat Consumption and Encourage Pro-environmental Behavioral Spillover.
    Wolstenholme E; Poortinga W; Whitmarsh L
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():577111. PubMed ID: 33117243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.