These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35270792)
1. Decision-Making and the Contract of the Complementary Product Supply Chain Considering Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Government Green Subsidies. Shao L; Liu Q Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supply chain decision based on green investment subsidy and risk aversion. Liu P; Yu S; Lin Z PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293924. PubMed ID: 37931002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal decisions and Pareto improvement for green supply chain considering reciprocity and cost-sharing contract. Yang M; Gong XM Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jun; 28(23):29859-29874. PubMed ID: 33575940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coordination Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Quota Policy. Zou H; Qin J; Long X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract. Liu X; Du W; Sun Y Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33105880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect. Zhang Z; Yu L Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(15):22325-22349. PubMed ID: 34786619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Government Subsidies on the Low-Carbon Supply Chain Based on Carbon Emission Reduction Level. Li B; Geng Y; Xia X; Qiao D Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34300054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gaming strategies within a green supply chain considering consumers' concern about the greenness and conformance quality of products. Yi Y; Yang M; Fu C; Li Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):69082-69100. PubMed ID: 35562611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sustainable strategies for green supply chain within the platform economy consider subsidies and marketing efforts. Zhang W; Wu Y; Luo R; Wang Y PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0292349. PubMed ID: 38015866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns. Wang D; Ge G; Zhou Y; Zhu M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(44):66235-66258. PubMed ID: 35499720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal control of carbon emission reduction strategies in supply chain with wholesale price and consignment contract. Zu Y; Deng D; Chen L Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(43):61707-61722. PubMed ID: 34189690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A behaviour-based pricing model of the green product supply chain. Liu K; Li W; Cao E; Lan Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(46):65923-65934. PubMed ID: 34327646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of competitive supply chains with retailers' horizontal cooperation and consumers' green preference. Shang W; Teng L; Yang JB Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(48):68426-68447. PubMed ID: 34272673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Competition among Supply Chains and Governmental Policy: Considering Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference. Pu X; Song Z; Han G Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30213066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Consumer's Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case. He J; Lei Y; Fu X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31835416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contract choice and advance selling strategy in a supply chain of FAP. Xie J; Liu D; Liang L; Li Q PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0265661. PubMed ID: 35324980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The government subsidy design considering the reference price effect in a green supply chain. Huang S; Du B; Chen Z; Cheng J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(15):22645-22662. PubMed ID: 38409384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Green Agricultural Products Supply Chain Subsidy Scheme with Green Traceability and Data-Driven Marketing of the Platform. Wang X; Zhang J; Ma D; Sun H Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A game-theoretic approach for decision analysis in end-of-life vehicle reverse supply chain regarding government subsidy. Gorji MA; Jamali MB; Iranpoor M Waste Manag; 2021 Feb; 120():734-747. PubMed ID: 33218925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Green supply chain game model and contract design: risk neutrality vs. risk aversion. Cai J; Lin H; Hu X; Ping M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(34):51871-51891. PubMed ID: 35257336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]