161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35271471)
1. [ASSESSMENT OF THE FEASIBILITY OF USING CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN CHILDREN FOR DIAGNOSTICS, 3D CEPHALOMETRY AND PLANNING ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT (REVIEW)].
Dakhno L; Vyshemyrska T; Burlakov P; Storozhenko K; Flis P
Georgian Med News; 2022 Feb; (323):54-60. PubMed ID: 35271471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo comparison of MRI- and CBCT-based 3D cephalometric analysis: beginning of a non-ionizing diagnostic era in craniomaxillofacial imaging?
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Weber D; Jende JME; Saleem MA; Zingler S; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 31802215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical vertebral column morphology in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea assessed using lateral cephalograms and cone beam CT. A comparative study.
Sonnesen L; Jensen KE; Petersson AR; Petri N; Berg S; Svanholt P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20130060. PubMed ID: 23503808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics.
Nervina JM
Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():95-102. PubMed ID: 22376101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms using artificial intelligence cephalometric analysis.
Chung EJ; Yang BE; Park IY; Yi S; On SW; Kim YH; Kang SH; Byun SH
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20585. PubMed ID: 36446924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults.
Farronato M; Cenzato N; Crispino R; Tartaglia FC; Biagi R; Baldini B; Maspero C
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100845. PubMed ID: 38350255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in three-dimensional cephalometry for clinical application.
Li N; Hu B; Mi F; Song J
Exp Ther Med; 2017 May; 13(5):2451-2455. PubMed ID: 28565862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D cephalometrics: the new norm.
Chenin DL
Alpha Omegan; 2010 Jun; 103(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 20645630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of MRI with dedicated head and neck signal amplification coil and cone beam computed tomography: MRI is a useful tool in diagnostics of cranio-facial growth disorders.
Grandoch A; Nestmann F; Kreppel M; Buller J; Borggrefe J; Zirk M; Zöller JE
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31439410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
