These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35271471)

  • 41. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.
    Gribel BF; Gribel MN; Frazäo DC; McNamara JA; Manzi FR
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 20936951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
    Swennen GR; Schutyser F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters.
    Pauwels R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):156-61. PubMed ID: 25805884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. SADMFR guidelines for the use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/ Digital Volume Tomography.
    Dula K; Bornstein MM; Buser D; Dagassan-Berndt D; Ettlin DA; Filippi A; Gabioud F; Katsaros C; Krastl G; Lambrecht JT; Lauber R; Luebbers HT; Pazera P; Türp JC;
    Swiss Dent J; 2014; 124(11):1169-83. PubMed ID: 25428284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Update on cone beam technology and orthodontic analysis.
    Kau CH; Li JL; Li Q; Abou Kheir N
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):653-69. PubMed ID: 24993927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions: a comparative study.
    Heinz J; Stewart K; Ghoneima A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 30342757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
    Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The evolution of cephalometric diagnosis in orthodontics.
    da Silva MB; Sant'Anna EF
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):63-71. PubMed ID: 24094013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics.
    Kapila S; Conley RS; Harrell WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Jan; 40(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 21159912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cone-beam computed tomography and three-dimensional orthodontics. Where we are and future perspectives.
    Leonardi R
    J Orthod; 2019 Jun; 46(1_suppl):45-48. PubMed ID: 31056034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study.
    Li C; Teixeira H; Tanna N; Zheng Z; Chen SHY; Zou M; Chung CH
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34943528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements.
    Farronato M; Maspero C; Abate A; Grippaudo C; Connelly ST; Tartaglia GM
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6295-6302. PubMed ID: 32382843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Three-dimensional Maxillofacial Morphology Measurements in Japanese Adults with Normal Occlusion.
    Takusagawa M; Nishii Y; Nojima K; Abe S; Takaki T; Sueishi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2023 Dec; 64(4):115-124. PubMed ID: 37967938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of type of radiograph and levels of experience and training on reproducibility of the cervical vertebral maturation method.
    Khajah A; Tadinada A; Allareddy V; Kuo CL; Nanda R; Uribe F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Feb; 157(2):228-239. PubMed ID: 32005475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
    Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Appropriate use of ionizing radiation in orthodontic practice and research.
    Abdelkarim AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 25636548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report.
    Benavides E; Rios HF; Ganz SD; An CH; Resnik R; Reardon GT; Feldman SJ; Mah JK; Hatcher D; Kim MJ; Sohn DS; Palti A; Perel ML; Judy KW; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 22382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness of 2D radiographs in detecting CBCT-based incidental findings in orthodontic patients.
    Choi JY; Oh SH; Kim SH; Ahn HW; Kang YG; Choi YS; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9280. PubMed ID: 33927309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Determination of the mesio-distal tooth width via 3D imaging techniques with and without ionizing radiation: CBCT, MSCT, and µCT versus MRI.
    Detterbeck A; Hofmeister M; Haddad D; Weber D; Schmid M; Hölzing A; Zabler S; Hofmann E; Hiller KH; Jakob P; Engel J; Hiller J; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):310-319. PubMed ID: 27365182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.
    Cevidanes LH; Styner MA; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):611-8. PubMed ID: 16679201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.