These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35271471)
61. New developments in: three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery. Popat H; Richmond S; Drage NA J Orthod; 2010 Mar; 37(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20439928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Comparison between full face and hemifacial CBCT cephalograms in clinically symmetrical patients: a pilot study. Junqueira CH; Janson G; Junqueira MH; Mendes LM; Favilla EE; Garib DG Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 25992992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis. Wriedt S; Jaklin J; Al-Nawas B; Wehrbein H J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Jan; 73(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 22246048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Reliability of cephalograms derived of cone beam computed tomography versus lateral cephalograms to estimate cervical vertebrae maturity in a Peruvian population: A retrospective study. Echevarría-Sánchez G; Arriola-Guillén LE; Malpartida-Carrillo V; Tinedo-López PL; Palti-Menendez R; Guerrero ME Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 32014428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Cephalogram synthesis and landmark detection in dental cone-beam CT systems. Huang Y; Fan F; Syben C; Roser P; Mill L; Maier A Med Image Anal; 2021 May; 70():102028. PubMed ID: 33744833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Some technical problems in three-dimensional cephalometrics]. Liu Y Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 51(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 27256525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Kapila SD; Nervina JM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(1):20140282. PubMed ID: 25358833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study. Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Assessment of inter- and intra-operator cephalometric tracings on cone beam CT radiographs: comparison of the precision of the cone beam CT versus the latero-lateral radiograph tracing. Farronato G; Salvadori S; Nolet F; Zoia A; Farronato D Prog Orthod; 2014 Jan; 15():1. PubMed ID: 24393493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Mah JK; Huang JC; Choo H J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Oct; 141 Suppl 3():7S-13S. PubMed ID: 20884934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Automatic Dent-landmark detection in 3-D CBCT dental volumes. Cheng E; Chen J; Yang J; Deng H; Wu Y; Megalooikonomou V; Gable B; Ling H Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6204-7. PubMed ID: 22255756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry. Shin HS; Nam KC; Park H; Choi HU; Kim HY; Park CS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20130439. PubMed ID: 24845340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [Evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry based on cone-beam CT image]. Zhang XY; Xu TM Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Feb; 45(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 23411540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes. Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 29957312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position. Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco P J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22777473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]