These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35272318)
21. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial. Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial). Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; Alhafidh AH; Hakvoort RA; Vierhout ME; van Eijndhoven HW BMC Womens Health; 2011 Feb; 11():4. PubMed ID: 21324143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of reconstructive vaginal surgery on quality of life and sexual functions in postmenopausal women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse in intermediate-term follow-up. Karaca SY Post Reprod Health; 2021 Sep; 27(3):145-150. PubMed ID: 33906490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new reusable suturing device for vaginal sacrospinous fixation: feasibility and safety study. Friedman T; Neuman M; Peled Y; Krissi H Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():23-6. PubMed ID: 26210292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of long-term results of obliterative colpocleisis and reconstructive vaginal surgery including sacrospinous ligament fixation in patients with total genital prolapse. Agacayak E; Bulut M; Peker N; Gunduz R; Tunc SY; Evsen MS; Gul T Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 May; 25(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 35593601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Correlation of subjective and objective assessment of vaginal prolapse surgery - secondary analysis of randomized controlled study in patients with pelvic floor injury treated with vaginal mesh or with sacrospinous ligament fixation]. Švabík K; El Haddad R; Mašata J; Hubka P; Martan A Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 26606120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genital prolapse repair using porcine skin implant and bilateral sacrospinous fixation: midterm functional outcome and quality-of-life assessment. Daraï E; Coutant C; Rouzier R; Ballester M; David-Montefiore E; Apfelbaum D Urology; 2009 Feb; 73(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 19038431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function. Okcu NT; Gürbüz T; Uysal G J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101977. PubMed ID: 33166707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Anterior Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Safe Route for Apical Repair. Solomon ER; St Marie P; Jones KA; Harmanli O Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(8):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 32487884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Late suture site complications of sacrospinous ligament fixation. Hamdy MA; Ahmed WAS; Taha OT; Abolill ZM; Elshahat AM; Aboelroose AA Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():126-130. PubMed ID: 31585239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect]. Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence]. Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The minimally invasive sacrospinous fixation under visual guidance: An anatomical study. Chene G; Cerruto E; Moret S; Nohuz E Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():36-39. PubMed ID: 38574698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse. Chen Y; Hua K Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 May; 137(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 28099748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sacrospinous fixation: Review of relevant anatomy and surgical technique. Goh JTW; Ganyaglo GYK Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; 162(3):842-846. PubMed ID: 36939527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Under Local Anesthesia in Elderly Patients at High Risk of General Anesthesia. Senturk MB; Doğan O J Invest Surg; 2020 Jan; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29733751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally invasive meshless and minimal dissection ligament fixation system for apical organ prolapse procedures: A 4-year prospective follow up study. Ben Zvi M; Weintraub AY; Friedman T; Neuman M; Tsivian A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 158(3):657-662. PubMed ID: 34850393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament: how to avoid complications related to the sacrospinous fixation procedure for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Giraudet G; Ruffolo AF; Lallemant M; Cosson M Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep; 34(9):2329-2332. PubMed ID: 36897371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension]. Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]