These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35272465)

  • 1. Discussion on the interpretation of the results and selection of the effect model in a meta-analysis.
    Tu J; Fang Q; Zhao A; Wu J
    Ann Palliat Med; 2022 Mar; 11(3):1153-1154. PubMed ID: 35272465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construction of subtype-specific prognostic gene signatures for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer using meta feature selection methods.
    Liu C; Wang L; Wang T; Tian S
    Oncol Lett; 2019 Sep; 18(3):2366-2375. PubMed ID: 31402939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis based variable selection for gene expression data.
    Li Q; Wang S; Huang CC; Yu M; Shao J
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):872-80. PubMed ID: 25196635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.
    Borenstein M; Hedges LV; Higgins JP; Rothstein HR
    Res Synth Methods; 2010 Apr; 1(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 26061376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sparse meta-analysis with high-dimensional data.
    He Q; Zhang HH; Avery CL; Lin DY
    Biostatistics; 2016 Apr; 17(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 26395907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
    Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 May; 17(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 24692250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hands-on practical tutorial on performing meta-analysis with Stata.
    Chaimani A; Mavridis D; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 Nov; 17(4):111-6. PubMed ID: 25288685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: An Evaluation of Selection Methods and Some Cautionary Notes.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U; Hansen KT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):730-749. PubMed ID: 27694467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
    Tang JL; Liu JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A guide to understanding meta-analysis.
    Israel H; Richter RR
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2011 Jul; 41(7):496-504. PubMed ID: 21725192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Choice of genetic model on Meta-analysis of genetic association studies: introduction of genetic model-free approach for Bayesian analysis].
    Weng H; Lin EX; Tong TJ; Wan X; Geng PL; Zeng XT
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1703-1707. PubMed ID: 29294591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century": discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions.
    Liberati A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7853051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discussion on the selection of the effect model in a meta-analysis.
    Fang Q; Wu J
    Ann Palliat Med; 2022 Dec; 11(12):3842-3843. PubMed ID: 36510464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.