These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35272465)

  • 21. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the Multilevel Nature of Meta-Analysis: A Tutorial, Comparison of Software Programs, and Discussion of Analytic Choices.
    Pastor DA; Lazowski RA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 28952787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of secondary outcomes in multivariate meta-analysis.
    Copas JB; Jackson D; White IR; Riley RD
    J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat; 2018 Nov; 67(5):1177-1205. PubMed ID: 30344346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating a test's accuracy using tailored meta-analysis-How setting-specific data may aid study selection.
    Willis BH; Hyde CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 24447592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Small group learning in medical education: a second look at the Springer, Stanne, and Donovan meta-analysis.
    Colliver JA; Feltovich PJ; Verhulst SJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 12632701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genetic model selection in genome-wide association studies: robust methods and the use of meta-analysis.
    Bagos PG
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):285-308. PubMed ID: 23629457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Like parent, like child: Is parent interpretation bias associated with their child's interpretation bias and anxiety? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Subar AR; Rozenman M
    J Affect Disord; 2021 Aug; 291():307-314. PubMed ID: 34077820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of the duration of antimicrobial exposure on the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) for macrolide antibiotics: protocol for a systematic review with a network meta-analysis.
    Divala TH; Corbett EL; Stagg HR; Nliwasa M; Sloan DJ; French N; Fielding KL
    Syst Rev; 2018 Dec; 7(1):246. PubMed ID: 30580758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Introduction to meta-analytic methodology].
    Nony P; Boissel JP; Lièvre M; Cucherat M; Haugh MC; Dayoub G
    Rev Med Interne; 1995; 16(7):536-46. PubMed ID: 7569424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selection criteria and generalizability within the counterfactual framework: explaining the paradox of antidepressant-induced suicidality?
    Weisberg HI; Hayden VC; Pontes VP
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19342462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selection of the appropriate binary effect measure for the correct interpretation in meta-analysis.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Doi SA
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 202():467-8. PubMed ID: 26436675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A tool to assess the quality of a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Lane PW; Anagnostelis B; Anzures-Cabrera J; Baker NF; Cappelleri JC; Haughie S; Hollis S; Lewis SC; Moneuse P; Whitehead A
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):351-66. PubMed ID: 26053948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Female obesity is negatively associated with live birth rate following IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sermondade N; Huberlant S; Bourhis-Lefebvre V; Arbo E; Gallot V; Colombani M; Fréour T
    Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Jul; 25(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 30941397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ForestPMPlot: A Flexible Tool for Visualizing Heterogeneity Between Studies in Meta-analysis.
    Kang EY; Park Y; Li X; Segrè AV; Han B; Eskin E
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jul; 6(7):1793-8. PubMed ID: 27194809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty due to missing binary outcome data in pairwise meta-analysis.
    Turner NL; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(12):2062-80. PubMed ID: 25809313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography.
    Toye F; Seers K; Allcock N; Briggs M; Carr E; Andrews J; Barker K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():46. PubMed ID: 23517438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression.
    Everaert J; Podina IR; Koster EHW
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2017 Dec; 58():33-48. PubMed ID: 28974339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.