154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35272477)
1. The Effect of Different Types of Prostate Biopsy Techniques on Post-Biopsy Infectious Complications.
Tops SCM; Grootenhuis JGA; Derksen AM; Giardina F; Kolwijck E; Wertheim HFL; Somford DM; Sedelaar JPM
J Urol; 2022 Jul; 208(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 35272477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transperineal prostate biopsy with cognitive magnetic resonance imaging/biplanar ultrasound fusion: description of technique and early results.
Gorin MA; Meyer AR; Zimmerman M; Harb R; Joice GA; Schwen ZR; Allaf ME
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1943-1949. PubMed ID: 31679065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of complications rates between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and systematic TRUS prostatic biopsies.
Queiroz MRG; Falsarella PM; Mariotti GC; Lemos GC; Baroni RH; Mussi TC; Garcia RG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):732-738. PubMed ID: 30255444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has limited additional benefit over background cores for larger MRI-identified tumors.
Barrett T; Patterson AJ; Koo BC; Wadhwa K; Warren AY; Doble A; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Gallagher FA
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 26238348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Single and Prolonged Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis and Risk Factors for Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.
Kalkanlı A; Gezmiş CT; Özkan A; Çilesiz NC; Yanaral F; Aydın M; Tandoğdu Z
Balkan Med J; 2018 Sep; 35(5):373-377. PubMed ID: 29866640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of In-Office MRI/US Fusion Transperineal Prostate Biopsy via Free-hand Device during Routine Clinical Practice.
Briggs LG; Kim M; Gusev A; Rumpf F; Feldman A; McGovern F; Tabatabaei S; Dahl DM
Urology; 2021 Sep; 155():26-32. PubMed ID: 34048827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy Techniques: Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound, Direct In-Bore MRI, and Image Fusion.
Venderink W; Govers TM; de Rooij M; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 28225639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications and Adverse Events of Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Target Biopsy Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Among Men with Prior Negative Biopsies: Results from the FUTURE Trial, a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kelder JC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):617-624. PubMed ID: 31519516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy?
Song G; Ruan M; Wang H; Fan Y; He Q; Lin Z; Li X; Li P; Wang X; He Z; Zhou L
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1202-1208. PubMed ID: 32716686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
