BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35273528)

  • 1. Incorporating Baseline Outcome Data in Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Non-randomized Studies.
    Syrogiannouli L; Wildisen L; Meuwese C; Bauer DC; Cappola AR; Gussekloo J; den Elzen WPJ; Trompet S; Westendorp RGJ; Jukema JW; Ferrucci L; Ceresini G; Åsvold BO; Chaker L; Peeters RP; Imaizumi M; Ohishi W; Vaes B; Völzke H; Sgarbi JA; Walsh JP; Dullaart RPF; Bakker SJL; Iacoviello M; Rodondi N; Del Giovane C
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():774251. PubMed ID: 35273528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Kauser I; Bland M; Thijs L; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Deeks JJ
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2747-66. PubMed ID: 23303608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment-by-baseline modification.
    Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Riley RD; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):780-794. PubMed ID: 32643264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and depressive symptoms: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
    Wildisen L; Moutzouri E; Beglinger S; Syrogiannouli L; Cappola AR; Åsvold BO; Bakker SJL; Ceresini G; Dullaart R; Ferrucci L; Grabe H; Jukema JW; Nauck M; Trompet S; Völzke H; Westendorp RGJ; Gussekloo J; Peeters RP; Klöppel S; Aujesky D; Bauer DC; Rodondi N; Del Giovane C; Feller M;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029716. PubMed ID: 31350252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
    Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Johara FT; Benedetti A; Platt R; Menzies D; Viiklepp P; Schaaf S; Chan E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):257. PubMed ID: 34814845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for chronic heart failure: the EXTRAMATCH II individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Taylor RS; Walker S; Ciani O; Warren F; Smart NA; Piepoli M; Davos CH
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 May; 23(25):1-98. PubMed ID: 31140973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?
    Bordewijk EM; Wang R; van Wely M; Costello MF; Norman RJ; Teede H; Gurrin LC; Mol BW; Li W
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Nov; 26(6):929-941. PubMed ID: 32935841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjusting for misclassification of an exposure in an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    de Jong VMT; Campbell H; Maxwell L; Jaenisch T; Gustafson P; Debray TPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Mar; 14(2):193-210. PubMed ID: 36200133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias, precision and statistical power of analysis of covariance in the analysis of randomized trials with baseline imbalance: a simulation study.
    Egbewale BE; Lewis M; Sim J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():49. PubMed ID: 24712304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Introduction to Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Seitidis G; Tsivgoulis G; Katsanos AH; Mavridis D
    Neurology; 2023 Jun; 100(23):1102-1110. PubMed ID: 36797070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three meta-analytic methods using data from digital interventions on type 2 diabetes.
    Kebede MM; Peters M; Heise TL; Pischke CR
    Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes; 2019; 12():59-73. PubMed ID: 30588055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review of methods for individual patient data meta- analysis with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Radji S; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():79. PubMed ID: 24943877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical comparison of four baseline covariate adjustment methods in analysis of continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang S; Paul J; Nantha-Aree M; Buckley N; Shahzad U; Cheng J; DeBeer J; Winemaker M; Wismer D; Punthakee D; Avram V; Thabane L
    Clin Epidemiol; 2014; 6():227-35. PubMed ID: 25053894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual participant data meta-analysis of intervention studies with time-to-event outcomes: A review of the methodology and an applied example.
    de Jong VMT; Moons KGM; Riley RD; Tudur Smith C; Marson AG; Eijkemans MJC; Debray TPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):148-168. PubMed ID: 31759339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.