128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35274792)
21. Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: detection of clinically significant cancer in a perfect match group.
Cho J; Ahn H; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Choe G; Byun SS; Hong SK
Prostate Int; 2020 Dec; 8(4):146-151. PubMed ID: 33425791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).
Gatti M; Faletti R; Calleris G; Giglio J; Berzovini C; Gentile F; Marra G; Misischi F; Molinaro L; Bergamasco L; Gontero P; Papotti M; Fonio P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1883-1893. PubMed ID: 30788558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of gadolinium in magnetic resonance imaging for early prostate cancer diagnosis: A diagnostic accuracy study.
Cosma I; Tennstedt-Schenk C; Winzler S; Psychogios MN; Pfeil A; Teichgraeber U; Malich A; Papageorgiou I
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227031. PubMed ID: 31869380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of abbreviated multiparametric MRI-derived protocols in predicting local staging of prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Giannarini G; Cereser L; Como G; Bonato F; Pizzolitto S; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Dal Moro F; Zuiani C; Girometti R
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):949-958. PubMed ID: 32718179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Classification of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Image Quality.
Cipollari S; Guarrasi V; Pecoraro M; Bicchetti M; Messina E; Farina L; Paci P; Catalano C; Panebianco V
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb; 55(2):480-490. PubMed ID: 34374181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Nomogram to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Targeted Biopsy for Index Lesion.
Kim MJ; Park SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Apr; 55(4):1226-1233. PubMed ID: 34296803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score: A bicentric study.
Girometti R; Blandino A; Zichichi C; Cicero G; Cereser L; De Martino M; Isola M; Zuiani C; Ficarra V; Valotto C; Bertolotto M; Giannarini G
Eur J Radiol; 2022 May; 150():110267. PubMed ID: 35325773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Multireader Exploratory Evaluation of Individual Pulse Sequence Cancer Detection on Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Gaur S; Harmon S; Gupta RT; Margolis DJ; Lay N; Mehralivand S; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 29705281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score for basic readers in prostate MRI: A multi-center study.
Basar Y; Alis D; Seker ME; Kartal MS; Guroz B; Arslan A; Sirolu S; Kurtcan S; Denizoglu N; Karaarslan E
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110923. PubMed ID: 37320883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.
Caglic I; Sushentsev N; Shah N; Warren AY; Lamb BW; Barrett T
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109804. PubMed ID: 34062473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The combined value of mpUS and mpMRI-TRUS fusion for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zhang X; Hong H; Liang D
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Oct; 22(1):60. PubMed ID: 36258247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy using routine clinical prostate multiparametric MRI and decipher genomic score.
Jambor I; Falagario U; Ratnani P; Perez IM; Demir K; Merisaari H; Sobotka S; Haines GK; Martini A; Beksac AT; Lewis S; Pahikkala T; Wiklund P; Nair S; Tewari A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 31566845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Texture analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer in the peripheral zone.
Özer H; Koplay M; Baytok A; Seher N; Demir LS; Kılınçer A; Kaynar M; Göktaş S
Turk J Med Sci; 2023 Jun; 53(3):701-711. PubMed ID: 37476894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Abbreviated Versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Active Surveillance for Prostate-Cancer Patients: Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Utility as a Decisional Tool.
Zattoni F; Maresca S; Dal Moro F; Bednarova I; Randazzo G; Basso G; Reitano G; Giannarini G; Zuiani C; Girometti R
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36832066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of Weighted Diffusion Subtraction for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Sato T; Isoda H; Fujimoto K; Furuta A; Fujimoto M; Ito K; Kobayashi T; Nakamoto Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 34085328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [
Bodar YJL; Zwezerijnen BGJC; van der Voorn PJ; Jansen BHE; Smit RS; Kol SQ; Meijer D; de Bie K; Yaqub M; Windhorst BAD; Hendrikse HNH; Vis AN; Oprea-Lager DE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 34725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
