128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35276656)
1. Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort.
Dibble CF; Zhang JK; Greenberg JK; Javeed S; Khalifeh JM; Jain D; Dorward I; Santiago P; Molina C; Pennicooke B; Ray WZ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Sep; 37(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 35276656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series.
Zhang JK; Greenberg JK; Javeed S; Benedict B; Botterbush KS; Dibble CF; Khalifeh JM; Brehm S; Jain D; Dorward I; Santiago P; Molina C; Pennicooke BH; Ray WZ
Global Spine J; 2023 Jul; ():21925682231193610. PubMed ID: 37522797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M
Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.
Khalifeh JM; Dibble CF; Stecher P; Dorward I; Hawasli AH; Ray WZ
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Oct; 19(5):518-529. PubMed ID: 32433773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Chang CC; Chou D; Pennicooke B; Rivera J; Tan LA; Berven S; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Nov; 34(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 33186902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Analysis of lumbosacral sagittal balance parameter variation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time 3D navigation techniques].
Ma CR; Chen HX; Li GJ; He XY; Wang LS; Huang T; Meng ZB
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Apr; 34(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 33896128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.
Carlson BB; Saville P; Dowdell J; Goto R; Vaishnav A; Gang CH; McAnany S; Albert TJ; Qureshi S
Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 30529420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.
Buell TJ; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Lafage V; Lafage R; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Kelly MP; Daniels AH; Gum JL; Soroceanu A; Hamilton DK; Gupta MC; Burton DC; Hostin RA; Kebaish KM; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Smith JS;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Aug; 35(6):729-742. PubMed ID: 34416723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a novel minimally invasive expandable interbody cage: patient-reported outcomes and radiographic parameters.
Woodward J; Malone H; Witiw CD; Kolcun JPG; Koro L; Keegan KC; Ahmad S; Kerolus MG; David BT; Fessler RD; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jun; 35(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 34087790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
Li R; Shao X; Li X; Liu Y; Jiang W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(3):e23783. PubMed ID: 33545942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
