These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35277237)

  • 1. Use of Bayesian networks in forensic soil casework.
    Uitdehaag SCA; Donders TH; Kuiper I; Wagner-Cremer F; Sjerps MJ
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 35277237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():136-146. PubMed ID: 29275089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct and Secondary Transfer of Touch DNA on a Credit Card: Evidence Evaluation Given Activity Level Propositions and Application of Bayesian Networks.
    Onofri M; Altomare C; Severini S; Tommolini F; Lancia M; Carlini L; Gambelunghe C; Carnevali E
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Apr; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 37239356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Practical Guide for the Formulation of Propositions in the Bayesian Approach to DNA Evidence Interpretation in an Adversarial Environment.
    Gittelson S; Kalafut T; Myers S; Taylor D; Hicks T; Taroni F; Evett IW; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 26248867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addressing uncertain assumptions in DNA evidence evaluation.
    Kruijver M; Kelly H; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102913. PubMed ID: 37453205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: On propositions addressing the actor or the activity.
    Kokshoorn B; Blankers BJ; de Zoete J; Berger CEH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():115-124. PubMed ID: 28715673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian networks and dissonant items of evidence: A case study.
    De March I; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102172. PubMed ID: 31629186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
    Samie L; Champod C; Taylor D; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102334. PubMed ID: 32563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the optimal forensic DNA analysis procedure following investigation of sample quality.
    Hedell R; Hedman J; Mostad P
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jul; 132(4):955-966. PubMed ID: 28717961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 21775236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Bayesian networks to track DNA movement through complex transfer scenarios.
    Taylor D; Samie L; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():69-80. PubMed ID: 31234042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using case specific experiments to evaluate fingermarks on knives given activity level propositions.
    de Ronde A; Kokshoorn B; de Puit M; de Poot CJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110710. PubMed ID: 33561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks.
    Evett IW; Gill PD; Jackson G; Whitaker J; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):520-30. PubMed ID: 12051330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Questions, propositions and assessing different levels of evidence: Forensic voice comparison in practice.
    Hughes V; Rhodes R
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):250-257. PubMed ID: 29895456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning about Bayesian networks for forensic interpretation: an example based on the 'the problem of multiple propositions'.
    Biedermann A; Voisard R; Taroni F
    Sci Justice; 2012 Sep; 52(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 22841144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.