These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35279475)

  • 1. Human perception of color differences using computer vision system measurements of raw pork loin.
    Altmann BA; Gertheiss J; Tomasevic I; Engelkes C; Glaesener T; Meyer J; Schäfer A; Wiesen R; Mörlein D
    Meat Sci; 2022 Jun; 188():108766. PubMed ID: 35279475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of pork loin quality using online computer vision system and artificial intelligence model.
    Sun X; Young J; Liu JH; Newman D
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jun; 140():72-77. PubMed ID: 29533814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appearance, consumer liking and preferences of Lucanian 'Soppressata' salami.
    Napolitano F; Girolami A; Faraone D; Chaudry MMA; Braghieri A
    Meat Sci; 2020 Sep; 167():108159. PubMed ID: 32388189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Communication: Effect of machine, anatomical location, and replication on instrumental color of boneless pork loins.
    Barkley KE; Fields B; Dilger AC; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(7):2747-2752. PubMed ID: 29878230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biology, strategies, and fresh meat consequences of manipulating the fatty acid composition of meat.
    Burnett DD; Legako JF; Phelps KJ; Gonzalez JM
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Feb; 98(2):. PubMed ID: 31999826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis on difference of consumer's evaluation on visual features of pork cuts.
    Lee YE; Lee HJ; Kim M; Yoon JW; Ryu M; Jo C
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2021 May; 63(3):614-625. PubMed ID: 34189509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer preferences for the color of unprocessed animal foods.
    Altmann BA; Trinks A; Mörlein D
    J Food Sci; 2023 Mar; 88(3):909-925. PubMed ID: 36727664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of D65/10° and A/10° illuminant/observer systems for colour measurement of raw pork.
    Karamucki T; Jakubowska M
    Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment; 2021; 20(4):485-496. PubMed ID: 34724372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 2° and 10° standard observers used with C and D65 illuminants in measurements of colour in raw minced pork loin.
    Karamucki T; Jakubowska M
    Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment; 2019; 18(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 31930791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing Australian consumer preferences for fresh pork meat attributes: A best-worst approach on 46 attributes.
    Duong C; Sung B; Lee S; Easton J
    Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108954. PubMed ID: 36041289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer preferences for pork chops in five Canadian provinces.
    Ngapo TM
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():102-110. PubMed ID: 28268205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diversity of Japanese consumers' requirements, sensory perceptions, and eating preferences for meat.
    Sasaki K
    Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13705. PubMed ID: 35266248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries.
    Lin-Schilstra L; Backus G; Snoek H; Mörlein D
    Meat Sci; 2022 May; 187():108736. PubMed ID: 35123247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image analysis with the computer vision system and the consumer test in evaluating the appearance of Lucanian dry sausage.
    Girolami A; Napolitano F; Faraone D; Di Bello G; Braghieri A
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jan; 96(1):610-6. PubMed ID: 24041911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled 'raised without antibiotics'.
    Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
    Appetite; 2022 Apr; 171():105900. PubMed ID: 34968563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of pork color attributes using computer vision system.
    Sun X; Young J; Liu JH; Bachmeier L; Somers RM; Chen KJ; Newman D
    Meat Sci; 2016 Mar; 113():62-4. PubMed ID: 26619035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of variability in pork carcass composition and quality between barrows and gilts.
    Overholt MF; Arkfeld EK; Mohrhauser DA; King DA; Wheeler TL; Dilger AC; Shackelford SD; Boler DD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4415-4426. PubMed ID: 27898864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potassium carbonate improves fresh pork quality characteristics.
    LeMaster MN; Chauhan SS; Wick MP; Clark DL; England EM
    Meat Sci; 2019 Oct; 156():222-230. PubMed ID: 31226650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.