These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35280202)

  • 1. Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression.
    Beyvers MC; Fraser LE; Fiehler K
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():795886. PubMed ID: 35280202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression.
    Gertz H; Voudouris D; Fiehler K
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2262-2268. PubMed ID: 28250147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicted reach consequences drive time course of tactile suppression.
    Fraser LE; Fiehler K
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 350():54-64. PubMed ID: 29768186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate activity in the tactile suppression network.
    Arikan BE; Voudouris D; Voudouri-Gertz H; Sommer J; Fiehler K
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 236():118000. PubMed ID: 33864902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of grasping demands on tactile suppression.
    Voudouris D; Fiehler K
    Hum Mov Sci; 2022 Jun; 83():102957. PubMed ID: 35576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile suppression stems from specific sensorimotor predictions.
    Fuehrer E; Voudouris D; Lezkan A; Drewing K; Fiehler K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 May; 119(20):e2118445119. PubMed ID: 35533281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relevance-dependent modulation of tactile suppression during active, passive and pantomime reach-to-grasp movements.
    Manzone DM; Inglis JT; Franks IM; Chua R
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():93-105. PubMed ID: 29162384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How visuomotor predictability and task demands affect tactile sensitivity on a moving limb during object interaction in a virtual environment.
    McManus M; Schütz I; Voudouris D; Fiehler K
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Dec; 10(12):231259. PubMed ID: 38094265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of visual processing on tactile suppression.
    Gertz H; Fiehler K; Voudouris D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195396. PubMed ID: 29617416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancement and suppression of tactile signals during reaching.
    Voudouris D; Fiehler K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1238-1248. PubMed ID: 28383966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early modality-specific somatosensory cortical regions are modulated by attended visual stimuli: interaction of vision, touch and behavioral intent.
    Staines WR; Popovich C; Legon JK; Adams MS
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():351. PubMed ID: 24795684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Somatosensory target information is used for reaching but not for saccadic eye movements.
    Goettker A; Fiehler K; Voudouris D
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Oct; 124(4):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 32845193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement.
    Juravle G; Deubel H; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):391-401. PubMed ID: 20018212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tactile perception during action observation.
    Vastano R; Inuggi A; Vargas CD; Baud-Bovy G; Jacono M; Pozzo T
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2585-94. PubMed ID: 27161552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic temporal modulation of somatosensory processing during reaching.
    Voudouris D; Fiehler K
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1928. PubMed ID: 33479355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile Gap Detection Deteriorates during Bimanual Symmetrical Movements under Mirror Visual Feedback.
    Bultitude JH; Juravle G; Spence C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146077. PubMed ID: 26731117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age effects on sensorimotor predictions: What drives increased tactile suppression during reaching?
    Klever L; Voudouris D; Fiehler K; Billino J
    J Vis; 2019 Aug; 19(9):9. PubMed ID: 31426084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.
    Whitwell RL; Ganel T; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():216. PubMed ID: 25999834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression.
    Juravle G; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 213(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 21717097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context-dependent changes in tactile perception during movement execution.
    Juravle G; McGlone F; Spence C
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():913. PubMed ID: 24367346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.