BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35282078)

  • 21. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.
    Chen X; Duan H; Liu P; Lin L; Ni Y; Li D; Dai E; Zhan X; Li P; Huo Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):121. PubMed ID: 35282114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SATEN III-Splitting Adjuvant Treatment of stage III ENdometrial cancers: an international, multicenter study.
    Kahramanoglu I; Meydanli MM; Taranenka S; Ayhan A; Salman C; Sanci M; Demirkiran F; Ortac F; Haidopoulos D; Sukhin V; Kaidarova D; Stepanyan A; Farazaneh F; Aliyev S; Ulrikh E; Kurdiani D; Yalcin İ; Mavrichev S; Akilli H; Sarı ME; Pletnev A; Aslan K; Bese T; Kairbayev M; Vlachos D; Gultekin M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Oct; 29(8):1271-1279. PubMed ID: 31481453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is there a difference in outcome between stage I-II endometrial cancer of papillary serous/clear cell and endometrioid FIGO Grade 3 cancer?
    Alektiar KM; McKee A; Lin O; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ; McKee B; Hoskins WJ; Barakat RR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 12182977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.
    Gasimli K; Braicu EI; Nassir M; Richter R; Babayeva A; Chekerov R; Darb-Esfahani S; Sehouli J; Muallem MZ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1279-86. PubMed ID: 26832880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical Cancer in Ethiopia: The Effect of Adherence to Radiotherapy on Survival.
    Moelle U; Mathewos A; Aynalem A; Wondemagegnehu T; Yonas B; Begoihn M; Addissie A; Unverzagt S; Jemal A; Thomssen C; Vordermark D; Kantelhardt EJ
    Oncologist; 2018 Sep; 23(9):1024-1032. PubMed ID: 29567823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
    Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009.
    Zhang Y; Ding J; Hua K
    J Int Med Res; 2022 Jan; 50(1):3000605211067397. PubMed ID: 34986672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
    Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the efficacy of prophylactic extended field irradiation in the concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, stage IIIB in the 2018 FIGO classification.
    Meng Q; Liu X; Wang W; Hou X; Lian X; Sun S; Yan J; Liu Z; Miao Z; Hu K; Zhang F
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):228. PubMed ID: 31842919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
    Wang W; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S
    Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1331. PubMed ID: 31828044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage.
    Balaya V; Guani B; Magaud L; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Mathevet P; Lécuru F; On Behalf Of The Senticol Group
    Cancers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33260758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.
    Liu P; Lin L; Kong Y; Huo Z; Zhu L; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32138718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
    Meng Q; Wang W; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang F
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():870670. PubMed ID: 35646645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wang Y; Li B; Ren F; Song Z; Ouyang L; Liu K
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1236. PubMed ID: 32903313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection according to lymph node ratio and N stage.
    Shin K; Park SJ; Lee J; Park CH; Song KY; Lee HH; Seo HS; Jung YJ; Park JM; Lee SH; Roh SY; Kim IH
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1232. PubMed ID: 31852475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Alone for Oncological Outcomes of Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Li W; Zhang W; Sun L; Wang L; Cui Z; Zhao H; Wang D; Zhang Y; Guo J; Yang Y; Wang W; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():730753. PubMed ID: 34589433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is the extent of lymphadenectomy a prognostic factor in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer?
    Cuylan ZF; Akilli H; Gungorduk K; Demirkiran F; Oz M; Salman MC; Sozen H; Celik H; Gokcu M; Bese T; Meydanli MM; Ozgul N; Topuz S; Kuscu E; Kuru O; Gokmen S; Gultekin M; Ayhan A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Mar; 47(3):1134-1144. PubMed ID: 33426779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.