These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35283235)
1. A Retrospective Review of Reimbursement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Disparity Between Case Complexity and RVU Compensation. Patel A; Oladipo V; Kerzner B; McGlothlin JD; Levine BR J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8S):S807-S813. PubMed ID: 35283235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective Review of Relative Value Units in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Dichotomy Between Surgical Complexity and Reimbursement. Patel A; Oladipo VA; Kerzner B; McGlothlin JD; Levine BR J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S44-S49. PubMed ID: 35304033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Barriers to Revision Total Hip Service Lines: A Surgeon's Perspective Through a Deterministic Financial Model. Feng JE; Anoushiravani AA; Schoof LH; Gabor JA; Padilla J; Slover J; Schwarzkopf R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):1657-1666. PubMed ID: 32574471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Work Relative Value Units Do Not Adequately Support the Burden of Infection Management in Revision Knee Arthroplasty. Samuel LT; Grits D; Acuña AJ; Piuzzi NS; Higuera-Rueda CA; Kamath AF J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Feb; 102(3):230-236. PubMed ID: 31609889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are We Appropriately Compensated by Relative Value Units for Primary vs Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? Sodhi N; Piuzzi NS; Khlopas A; Newman JM; Kryzak TJ; Stearns KL; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):340-344. PubMed ID: 28993077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary Versus Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Peterson J; Sodhi N; Khlopas A; Piuzzi NS; Newman JM; Sultan AA; Stearns KL; Mont MA J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S39-S42. PubMed ID: 29276122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are Joint Surgeons Being Adequately Compensated for Single-Component versus Double-Component Revision TKA? An Analysis of Relative Value Units. Malik AT; Scharschmidt TJ; Li M; Jain N; Khan SN J Knee Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(6):593-596. PubMed ID: 30861538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Relative Value Units in Primary versus Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Sodhi N; Yao B; Newman JM; Jawad M; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Lamaj S; Beyer GA; Wilhelm AB; Mont MA Surg Technol Int; 2017 Dec; 31():322-326. PubMed ID: 29316589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Why Are Contemporary Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties Failing? An Analysis of 2500 Cases. Goldman AH; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Abdel MP J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S11-S16. PubMed ID: 30765230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement? Sodhi N; Dalton SE; Garbarino LJ; Gold PA; Piuzzi NS; Newman JM; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Chughtai M; Mont MA Ann Transl Med; 2019 Feb; 7(4):74. PubMed ID: 30963069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications. Jennings JM; White S; Martin JR; Yang CC; Miner TM; Dennis DA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):344-350. PubMed ID: 30794222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reimbursement for Hip Fractures: The Impact of Varied Current Procedural Terminology Coding Using Relative Value Units. Beck CM; Blair SE; Nana AD J Arthroplasty; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3464-3466. PubMed ID: 32741709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current Trends in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Indications and Types of Components Revised. Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Ryan SP; Cunningham DJ; Green CL; Lachiewicz PF J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S611-S615.e7. PubMed ID: 35276275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursement for Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Study Showing Significant Decrease from 2002 to 2019. Acuña AJ; Jella TK; Samuel LT; Schwarzkopf R; Fehring TK; Kamath AF J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(13):1212-1219. PubMed ID: 33764932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of uncemented acetabular liner geometry and lip size on the risk of revision for instability or loosening : a study on 202,511 primary hip arthroplasties from the National Joint Registry. Divecha HM; O'Neill TW; Lunt M; Board TN Bone Joint J; 2021 Dec; 103-B(12):1774-1782. PubMed ID: 34847718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost Analysis of Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multi-Institutional Database Study. Denyer S; Eikani C; Bujnowski D; Farooq H; Brown N J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Mar; 105(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 36727914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in reimbursement for primary and revision total elbow arthroplasty. Sugarman BS; Belay ES; Saltzman EB; Richard MJ; Ruch DS; Anakwenze OA; Klifto CS J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):146-150. PubMed ID: 32610075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Septic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Adequately Compensated by Work Relative Value Units. Quan T; Best MJ; Gu A; Stake S; Golladay GJ; Thakkar SC J Arthroplasty; 2021 May; 36(5):1496-1501. PubMed ID: 33349496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up? Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Lachiewicz PF; Ryan SP; Wellman SS Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified acetabular component liner designs are not superior to standard liners at reducing the risk of revision : an analysis of 151,096 cementless total hip arthroplasties from the German Arthroplasty Registry. Krull P; Steinbrück A; Grimberg AW; Melsheimer O; Morlock M; Perka C Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):801-810. PubMed ID: 35775174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]