153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35284053)
1. Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar.
Chae SK; Cho WT; Choi JW; Bae EB; Bae JH; Bae GH; Huh JB
J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 14(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 35284053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures.
Shastry T; Anupama NM; Shetty S; Nalinakshamma M
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27141166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.
Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):487.e1-487.e12. PubMed ID: 35934574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Different Designs of Milled Bar Attachments for Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
Mahrous AI; El Afandy HM; Elsyad MA; Mohamed SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 36450025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trend of change in retentive force for bar attachments with different materials.
Saito M; Kanazawa M; Takahashi H; Uo M; Minakuchi S
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1545-52. PubMed ID: 25023010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study.
Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):738.e1-738.e6. PubMed ID: 32165012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retentive force variations of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
Boulos PJ; Akiki LA; Makzoumé JE; Fakhoury J; Tohmé H; El Hage FS
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):41-45. PubMed ID: 29964247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of different materials on retention behavior of CAD-CAM fabricated bar attachments.
Abdelrehim A; Abdelhakim A; ElDakkak S
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):765-775. PubMed ID: 33773770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-Supported Overdentures: Current Status and Preclinical Testing of a Novel Attachment System.
Wendler F; Diehl L; Shayanfard P; Karl M
J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retentive force and dislodgment time variations between three implant overdenture stud attachments in an acidic environment: An in-vitro pilot study.
Farhat M; Daher T; Hajjar JJ; Boulos PJ
Saudi Dent J; 2024 Feb; 36(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 38419987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report.
Kim MS; Yoon MJ; Huh JB; Jeon YC; Jeong CM
J Adv Prosthodont; 2012 May; 4(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 22737318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fabricating CAD/CAM Implant-Retained Mandibular Bar Overdentures: A Clinical and Technical Overview.
Goo CL; Tan KB
Case Rep Dent; 2017; 2017():9373818. PubMed ID: 28396807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vitro Effect of Mastication on the Retention and Wear of Locator Attachments in a Flat Mandibular Ridge Model.
Tehini G; Baba NZ; Majzoub Z; Nahas P; Berberi A; Rifai K
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e744-e751. PubMed ID: 29968276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate Loading of Two Dental Implants, in Edentulous Mandibles, with Locator® Attachments or Dolder® Bars: First Results from a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study.
Kappel S; Eberhard L; Giannakopoulos NN; Rammelsberg P; Eiffler C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):629-38. PubMed ID: 24215715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
