150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35284329)
1. A 3-year retrospective study of clinical durability of bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
Ugurlu M; Sari F
Restor Dent Endod; 2022 Feb; 47(1):e5. PubMed ID: 35284329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation.
van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Aug; 125(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 28524243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study.
Al-Nahedh HN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of gingival wall location on the marginal seal of class ii restorations prepared with a flowable bulk-fill resin-based composite.
Segal P; Candotto V; Ben-Amar A; Eger M; Matalon S; Lauritano D; Ormianer Z
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(2 Suppl. 1):11-18. PubMed ID: 29460513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in medium- and large size direct class II restorations using a bulk-fill or layering technique.
Dietschi D; Curto FD; Di Bella E; Krejci I; Ardu S
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103828. PubMed ID: 34678337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance of Class I nanohybrid composite restorations with resin-modified glass-ionomer liner and flowable composite liner: A randomized clinical trial.
Suhasini K; Madhusudhana K; Suneelkumar C; Lavanya A; Chandrababu KS; Kumar PD
J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(6):510-515. PubMed ID: 27994310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
Guney T; Yazici AR
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites.
Bayraktar Y; Ercan E; Hamidi MM; Çolak H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26800647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.
Stefanski S; van Dijken JW
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 21104100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 24-month randomized clinical study of flowable bulk-fill resin composites in Class III restorations.
Signore A; Solimei L; Arakelyan MG; Benedicenti S; Mollica C
J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e111-e123. PubMed ID: 38496810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
