155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35284486)
1. Surgical Techniques for Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All.
Wilkins S; Yap R; Mendis S; Carne P; McMurrick PJ
Front Surg; 2022; 9():818097. PubMed ID: 35284486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Perdawood SK; Lund T
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
Neşşar G; Demirbağ AE; Celep B; Elbir OH; Kayaalp C
Ulus Cerrahi Derg; 2016; 32(4):244-247. PubMed ID: 28149119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer.
Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial.
Bianco F; Romano G; Tsarkov P; Stanojevic G; Shroyer K; Giuratrabocchetta S; Bergamaschi R;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 27369739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.
Carpelan A; Karvonen J; Varpe P; Rantala A; Kaljonen A; Grönroos J; Huhtinen H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Apr; 33(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 29445870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu HC; Peng H; He XS; Zhao RS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Feb; 29(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 24271080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Seshadri RA; West NP; Sundersingh S
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):O253-O262. PubMed ID: 28503808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.
Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cheung T; Knight JS; Nichols PH; Pilkington SA; Mirnezami AH
Tech Coloproctol; 2012 Oct; 16(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 22777690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Ortiz H; Ciga MA; Armendariz P; Kreisler E; Codina-Cazador A; Gomez-Barbadillo J; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
Br J Surg; 2014 Jun; 101(7):874-82. PubMed ID: 24817654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.
Huang A; Zhao H; Ling T; Quan Y; Zheng M; Feng B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 24385025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term advantages of ELAPE over APR.
Papp G; Dede K; Bursics A
Acta Chir Belg; 2021 Oct; 121(5):327-332. PubMed ID: 32496868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extralevatory abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) does not result in reduced rate of tumor perforation or rate of positive circumferential resection margin: a nationwide database study.
Klein M; Fischer A; Rosenberg J; Gögenur I;
Ann Surg; 2015 May; 261(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 25211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical outcome after standard abdominoperineal resection: A 15-year cohort study from a single cancer centre.
Wilkins S; Yap R; Loon K; Staples M; Oliva K; Ruggiero B; McMurrick P; Carne P
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2018 Dec; 36():83-89. PubMed ID: 30425830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer].
Jiang HY; Zhou YB; Zhang DF
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 16(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 23888442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perineal Wound Complications Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Experience of a Regional Cancer Center.
Aggarwal N; Seshadri RA; Arvind A; Jayanand SB
Indian J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 9(2):211-214. PubMed ID: 29887703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (Elape): A retrospective cohort study.
Hanif Z; Bradley A; Hammad A; Mukherjee A
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2016 Sep; 10():32-5. PubMed ID: 27508080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision (ELAPE) is Not Superior to Abdominoperineal Excision (APE) in the Era of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.
Ulusoy C; Nikolovski A
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2022 Nov; 43(3):21-27. PubMed ID: 36473043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The quality of lymph node harvests in extralevator abdominoperineal excisions.
Liu B; Farquharson J
BMC Surg; 2020 Oct; 20(1):241. PubMed ID: 33066759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
