BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3528524)

  • 1. An evaluation of fetal weight prediction using a simple equation containing the fetal femur length.
    Woo JS; Wan MC
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Aug; 5(8):453-7. PubMed ID: 3528524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
    Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length.
    Woo JS; Wan CW; Cho KM
    J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Feb; 4(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 3882988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation and detection of small for gestational age fetuses.
    Palo P; Erkkola R; Piiroinen O; Ruotsalainen P
    Am J Perinatol; 1989 Oct; 6(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 2675872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractional spine length: a new parameter for assessing fetal growth.
    Li DF; Woo JS
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Jul; 5(7):379-83. PubMed ID: 3522928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
    Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
    Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
    Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF; Bors-Koefoed R; Nochimson DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 3618691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
    Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound-comparison of biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL).
    Hsieh FJ; Chang FM; Huang HC; Lu CC; Ko TM; Chen HY
    Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1987 Sep; 86(9):957-64. PubMed ID: 3320270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum fetal weight estimation: a comparison of three formulae.
    Yarkoni S; Reece EA; Wan M; Holford T; Romero R; Hobbins JC
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Dec; 5(12):707-10. PubMed ID: 3543391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements.
    Hadlock FP; Harrist RB; Carpenter RJ; Deter RL; Park SK
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):535-40. PubMed ID: 6691115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A New Sonographic Weight Estimation Formula for Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
    Faschingbauer F; Dammer U; Raabe E; Kehl S; Schmid M; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Mayr A
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Aug; 35(8):1713-24. PubMed ID: 27353069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of birthweight by fetal ultrasound biometry.
    Nzeh DA; Rimmer S; Moore WM; Hunt L
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):987-9. PubMed ID: 1450836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic estimates of fetal weight in the intrauterine growth retardation population.
    Guidetti DA; Divon MY; Braverman JJ; Langer O; Merkatz IR
    Am J Perinatol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 2403794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the femur length to estimate fetal weight in premature infants: preliminary results.
    Campbell WA; Vintzileos AM; Neckles S; Weinbaum PJ; Nochimson DJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Nov; 4(11):583-90. PubMed ID: 3908705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.
    Warsof SL; Wolf P; Coulehan J; Queenan JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):569-73. PubMed ID: 3515257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.