These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. From perceptual organization to visual illusions and back. Pinna B; Porcheddu D; Skilters J Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():960542. PubMed ID: 36569477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Children with spina bifida perceive visual illusions but not multistable figures. Dennis M; Rogers T; Barnes MA Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):108-13. PubMed ID: 11527307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Illusion decrement and transfer of illusion decrement in real- and subjective-contour Poggendorff figures. Beckett PA Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 2740195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The Mechanisms of the Visual System Behind Visual Illusions: From Eye to Brain]. Yoshimoto S; Takeuchi T Brain Nerve; 2021 Nov; 73(11):1243-1248. PubMed ID: 34759062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retinal projection or size constancy as determinants of the horizontal-vertical illusion? von Collani G Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Oct; 61(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 4069920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individual differences in the perception of visual illusions are stable across eyes, time, and measurement methods. Cretenoud AF; Grzeczkowski L; Kunchulia M; Herzog MH J Vis; 2021 May; 21(5):26. PubMed ID: 34029369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors underlying visual illusions are illusion-specific but not feature-specific. Cretenoud AF; Karimpur H; Grzeczkowski L; Francis G; Hamburger K; Herzog MH J Vis; 2019 Dec; 19(14):12. PubMed ID: 31830241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The case for misapplied constancy scaling: depth associations elicited by illusion configurations. Ward LM; Porac C; Coren S; Girgus JS Am J Psychol; 1977 Dec; 90(4):609-20. PubMed ID: 610448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the gravitational vertical on geometric visual illusions. Clément G; Eckardt J Acta Astronaut; 2005; 56(9-12):911-7. PubMed ID: 15835042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Nemati F Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brightness induction and the Café Wall illusion. McCourt ME Perception; 1983; 12(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 6657418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Figure-ground organization in real and subjective contours: a new ambiguous figure, some novel measures of ambiguity, and apparent distance across regions of figure and ground. Shank MD; Walker JT Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 2762100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Poggendorff illusion: an illusion of linear extent? Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR Perception; 1981; 10(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 7279544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A review of face illusions]. Kitaoka A Brain Nerve; 2012 Jul; 64(7):779-91. PubMed ID: 22764350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of apparent depth and context in the perception of the Ponzo illusion. Schiffman HR; Thompson JG Perception; 1978; 7(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 628580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Similar processing of real- and subjective-contour Poggendorff figures by men and women. Beckett PA Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2326138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory illusion analogous to the Baldwin figure in vision. Brigner WL Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Oct; 65(2):527-30. PubMed ID: 3696922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]