147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35285890)
1. Usefulness of Cyclin D1/Podoplanin Dual Immunohistochemical Stain to Differentiate Malignant Mesothelioma From Reactive Mesothelial Proliferations.
Pillappa R; Wiles A; Sayeed S; Robila V
Am J Clin Pathol; 2022 Aug; 158(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 35285890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cyclin D1 immunohistochemical staining to separate benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations.
Pors J; Naso J; Berg K; Churg A
Mod Pathol; 2020 Feb; 33(2):312-318. PubMed ID: 31685964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Highlights of the 14th international mesothelioma interest group meeting: Pathologic separation of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations and histologic/molecular analysis of malignant mesothelioma subtypes.
Churg A; Nabeshima K; Ali G; Bruno R; Fernandez-Cuesta L; Galateau-Salle F
Lung Cancer; 2018 Oct; 124():95-101. PubMed ID: 30268487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase and BRCA-associated protein 1 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology specimens.
Berg KB; Churg AM; Cheung S; Dacic S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 31821740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immunohistochemical evaluation of nuclear 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) accurately distinguishes malignant pleural mesothelioma from benign mesothelial proliferations.
Chapel DB; Husain AN; Krausz T
Mod Pathol; 2019 Mar; 32(3):376-386. PubMed ID: 30315275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase Compared With BAP1 Immunohistochemistry, and CDKN2A and NF2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Separating Reactive Mesothelial Proliferations From Epithelioid Malignant Mesotheliomas.
Berg KB; Dacic S; Miller C; Cheung S; Churg A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Dec; 142(12):1549-1553. PubMed ID: 30059257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent Advances in the Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma: Focus on Approach in Challenging Cases and in Limited Tissue and Cytologic Samples.
Monaco S; Mehrad M; Dacic S
Adv Anat Pathol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 29227332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. UHRF1 Immunohistochemical Staining Separates Benign Reactive Spindle Cell Mesothelial Proliferations From Sarcomatoid Mesotheliomas.
Yang H; Cheung S; Churg A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2022 Jun; 46(6):840-845. PubMed ID: 34772842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. c-MET immunohistochemistry for differentiating malignant mesothelioma from benign mesothelial proliferations.
Ren HZ; Cheung S; Churg A
Hum Pathol; 2020 Nov; 105():31-36. PubMed ID: 32916162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CD146 immunohistochemical staining for the separation of benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations.
Salisbury T; Churg A
Virchows Arch; 2021 Nov; 479(5):1047-1050. PubMed ID: 33721119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation].
Szczepulska-Wójcik E; Langfort R; Roszkowski-Sliz K
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2007; 75(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 17541913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor in reactive and malignant mesothelial proliferations.
Cai YC; Roggli V; Mark E; Cagle PT; Fraire AE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Jan; 128(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 14692808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic utility of D2-40 and podoplanin in effusion cell blocks.
Bhalla R; Siddiqui MT; Mandich D; Cartun RW; Fiel-Gan MD; Nassar A; Mandavilli SR
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 17497664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of Glut-1 and Koc markers in the differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, malignant mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Üçer Ö; Dağli AF; Kiliçarslan A; Artaş G
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 23661345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunohistochemical expression of osteopontin in epithelioid mesotheliomas and reactive mesothelial proliferations.
Tigrani DY; Weydert JA
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 17369133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oncofetal protein IMP3, a new diagnostic biomarker to distinguish malignant mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferation.
Shi M; Fraire AE; Chu P; Cornejo K; Woda BA; Dresser K; Rock KL; Jiang Z
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 21566519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Staining to Separate Sarcomatoid Malignant Mesotheliomas From Benign Mesothelial Reactions.
Derakhshan F; Ionescu D; Cheung S; Churg A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Feb; 144(2):185-188. PubMed ID: 31484000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aberrant Pax-8 expression in well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma and malignant mesothelioma of the peritoneum: a clinicopathologic study.
Xing D; Banet N; Sharma R; Vang R; Ronnett BM; Illei PB
Hum Pathol; 2018 Feb; 72():160-166. PubMed ID: 29241740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New developments in mesothelial pathology.
Churg A
Histopathology; 2024 Jan; 84(1):136-152. PubMed ID: 37694811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic capacity of BAP1 and MTAP in cytology from effusions and biopsy in mesothelioma.
Lynggård LA; Panou V; Szejniuk W; Røe OD; Meristoudis C
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(6):385-393. PubMed ID: 35945149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
