179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35286136)
21. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Compared to Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the United States.
Garrison LP; Babigumira J; Tournier C; Goertz HP; Lubinga SJ; Perez EA
Value Health; 2019 Apr; 22(4):408-415. PubMed ID: 30975391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of adding rh-endostatin to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China.
Wu B; Chen H; Shen J; Ye M
Clin Ther; 2011 Oct; 33(10):1446-55. PubMed ID: 21992806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Economic Evaluation of Adding Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients in Indonesia.
Kristin E; Endarti D; Khoe LC; Taroeno-Hariadi KW; Trijayanti C; Armansyah A; Sastroasmoro S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Jun; 22(6):1921-1926. PubMed ID: 34181352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Sugiura K; Seo Y; Takahashi T; Tokura H; Ito Y; Tanaka M; Kishida N; Nishi Y; Onishi Y; Aoki H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):184. PubMed ID: 33879100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-effectiveness analysis of additional bevacizumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma based on the MAPS trial.
Zhan M; Zheng H; Xu T; Yang Y; Li Q
Lung Cancer; 2017 Aug; 110():1-6. PubMed ID: 28676211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost Effectiveness of Chemotherapeutic Agents and Targeted Biologics in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Poonawalla IB; Parikh RC; Du XL; VonVille HM; Lairson DR
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1155-85. PubMed ID: 26072142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Mehta DA; Hay JW
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):677-83. PubMed ID: 24463160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-effectiveness of Capecitabine + Irinotecan Versus Leucovorin + Fluorouracil + Irinotecan in the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in China.
Wu Q; Zhang P; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Li Q
Clin Ther; 2020 Nov; 42(11):2148-2158.e2. PubMed ID: 32981743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Everolimus plus exemestane versus bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in Greece: An economic evaluation study.
Kourlaba G; Rapti V; Alexopoulos A; Relakis J; Koumakis G; Chatzikou M; Maniadakis N; Georgoulias V
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Aug; 15():307. PubMed ID: 26239115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China.
Li X; Li W; Hou L
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 May; 18():1-7. PubMed ID: 30412913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from China.
Yang Z; Zhu Y; Xiang G; Hua T; Ni J; Zhao J; Lu Y; Wu Y; Chang F
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Oct; 21(5):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 33682554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeting therapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Chuai Y; Rizzuto I; Zhang X; Li Y; Dai G; Otter SJ; Bharathan R; Stewart A; Wang A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD013348. PubMed ID: 33661538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of
Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V
J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the USA.
Zeng X; Wan X; Peng L; Peng Y; Ma F; Liu Q; Tan C
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031019. PubMed ID: 31831534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
