These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35286262)

  • 1. A Lower-Back Exoskeleton With a Four-Bar Linkage Structure for Providing Extensor Moment and Lumbar Traction Force.
    Moon C; Bae J; Kwak J; Hong D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():729-737. PubMed ID: 35286262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.
    Koopman AS; Näf M; Baltrusch SJ; Kingma I; Rodriguez-Guerrero C; Babič J; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 105():109795. PubMed ID: 32423541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the physiological benefits of a passive back-support exoskeleton during lifting and working in forward leaning postures.
    van Sluijs RM; Wehrli M; Brunner A; Lambercy O
    J Biomech; 2023 Mar; 149():111489. PubMed ID: 36806003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time lumbosacral joint loading estimation in exoskeleton-assisted lifting conditions via electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; Durandau G; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111727. PubMed ID: 37499430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review.
    Kermavnar T; de Vries AW; de Looze MP; O'Sullivan LW
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jun; 64(6):685-711. PubMed ID: 33369518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work.
    Bosch T; van Eck J; Knitel K; de Looze M
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():212-7. PubMed ID: 26851481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible sensor-based biomechanical evaluation of low-back exoskeleton use in lifting.
    Yin W; Chen Y; Reddy C; Zheng L; Mehta RK; Zhang X
    Ergonomics; 2024 Feb; 67(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 37204270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting.
    Schmalz T; Colienne A; Bywater E; Fritzsche L; Gärtner C; Bellmann M; Reimer S; Ernst M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 34763618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of different back-supporting exoskeletons regarding musculoskeletal loading during lifting and holding.
    Johns J; Schultes I; Heinrich K; Potthast W; Glitsch U
    J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112125. PubMed ID: 38688184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low-back during symmetric lifting.
    Koopman AS; Kingma I; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109486. PubMed ID: 31718821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Consequences of Using Passive and Active Back-Support Exoskeletons during Different Manual Handling Tasks.
    Schwartz M; Desbrosses K; Theurel J; Mornieux G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 37569010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect Analysis of Wearing an Lumbar Exoskeleton on Coordinated Activities of the Low Back Muscles Using sEMG Topographic Maps.
    Jiang N; Wang D; Ji X; Wang L; Wu X; Li G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2024; 32():259-270. PubMed ID: 38165795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Passive exoskeletons alter low back load transfer mechanism.
    Zou H; Choi J; Hyeon Kang S; Kim S; Jin S
    J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 147():111437. PubMed ID: 36680890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks.
    Koopman AS; Kingma I; Faber GS; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2019 Jan; 83():97-103. PubMed ID: 30514627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Pilot Study of Varying Thoracic and Abdominal Compression in a Reconfigurable Trunk Exoskeleton During Different Activities.
    Gorsic M; Regmi Y; Johnson AP; Dai B; Novak D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Jun; 67(6):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 31502962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Backbone-Tracking Passive Exoskeleton to Reduce the Stress on the Low-Back: Proof of Concept Study.
    Pesenti M; Gandolla M; Pedrocchi A; Roveda L
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2022 Jul; 2022():1-6. PubMed ID: 36176166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and evaluation of the OmniSuit: A passive occupational exoskeleton for back and shoulder support.
    van Sluijs R; Scholtysik T; Brunner A; Kuoni L; Bee D; Kos M; Bartenbach V; Lambercy O
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Oct; 120():104332. PubMed ID: 38876001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust estimation of lumbar joint forces in symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks via large-scale electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2022 Nov; 144():111307. PubMed ID: 36191432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of passive back-support exoskeletons on physical demands and usability during patient transfer tasks.
    Hwang J; Kumar Yerriboina VN; Ari H; Kim JH
    Appl Ergon; 2021 May; 93():103373. PubMed ID: 33516046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking.
    Baltrusch SJ; van Dieën JH; Bruijn SM; Koopman AS; van Bennekom CAM; Houdijk H
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jul; 62(7):903-916. PubMed ID: 30929608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.