191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35286377)
1. Predicting base editing outcomes using position-specific sequence determinants.
Pallaseni A; Peets EM; Koeppel J; Weller J; Vanderstichele T; Ho UL; Crepaldi L; van Leeuwen J; Allen F; Parts L
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Apr; 50(6):3551-3564. PubMed ID: 35286377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sequence-specific prediction of the efficiencies of adenine and cytosine base editors.
Song M; Kim HK; Lee S; Kim Y; Seo SY; Park J; Choi JW; Jang H; Shin JH; Min S; Quan Z; Kim JH; Kang HC; Yoon S; Kim HH
Nat Biotechnol; 2020 Sep; 38(9):1037-1043. PubMed ID: 32632303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precise in vivo functional analysis of DNA variants with base editing using ACEofBASEs target prediction.
Cornean A; Gierten J; Welz B; Mateo JL; Thumberger T; Wittbrodt J
Elife; 2022 Apr; 11():. PubMed ID: 35373735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. sgBE: a structure-guided design of sgRNA architecture specifies base editing window and enables simultaneous conversion of cytosine and adenosine.
Wang Y; Zhou L; Tao R; Liu N; Long J; Qin F; Tang W; Yang Y; Chen Q; Yao S
Genome Biol; 2020 Aug; 21(1):222. PubMed ID: 32859244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circularly permuted and PAM-modified Cas9 variants broaden the targeting scope of base editors.
Huang TP; Zhao KT; Miller SM; Gaudelli NM; Oakes BL; Fellmann C; Savage DF; Liu DR
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 Jun; 37(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 31110355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of Base Editing Efficiencies and Outcomes Using DeepABE and DeepCBE.
Park J; Kim HK
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2606():23-32. PubMed ID: 36592305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internally inlaid SaCas9 base editors enable window specific base editing.
Jiang L; Long J; Yang Y; Zhou L; Su J; Qin F; Tang W; Tao R; Chen Q; Yao S
Theranostics; 2022; 12(10):4767-4778. PubMed ID: 35832085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Base Editing: Technical Considerations and Practical Applications.
Molla KA; Yang Y
Trends Biotechnol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):1121-1142. PubMed ID: 30995964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determinants of Base Editing Outcomes from Target Library Analysis and Machine Learning.
Arbab M; Shen MW; Mok B; Wilson C; Matuszek Ż; Cassa CA; Liu DR
Cell; 2020 Jul; 182(2):463-480.e30. PubMed ID: 32533916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adenine transversion editors enable precise, efficient A•T-to-C•G base editing in mammalian cells and embryos.
Chen L; Hong M; Luan C; Gao H; Ru G; Guo X; Zhang D; Zhang S; Li C; Wu J; Randolph PB; Sousa AA; Qu C; Zhu Y; Guan Y; Wang L; Liu M; Feng B; Song G; Liu DR; Li D
Nat Biotechnol; 2024 Apr; 42(4):638-650. PubMed ID: 37322276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cytosine base editor toolkit with varying activity windows and target scopes for versatile gene manipulation in plants.
Xiong X; Li Z; Liang J; Liu K; Li C; Li JF
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Apr; 50(6):3565-3580. PubMed ID: 35286371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Base Editing Landscape Extends to Perform Transversion Mutation.
Molla KA; Qi Y; Karmakar S; Baig MJ
Trends Genet; 2020 Dec; 36(12):899-901. PubMed ID: 32951947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors.
Grünewald J; Zhou R; Garcia SP; Iyer S; Lareau CA; Aryee MJ; Joung JK
Nature; 2019 May; 569(7756):433-437. PubMed ID: 30995674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Off-target effects of base editors: what we know and how we can reduce it.
Slesarenko YS; Lavrov AV; Smirnikhina SA
Curr Genet; 2022 Feb; 68(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 34515826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precision genome engineering through adenine and cytosine base editing.
Kim JS
Nat Plants; 2018 Mar; 4(3):148-151. PubMed ID: 29483683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos.
Zuo E; Sun Y; Wei W; Yuan T; Ying W; Sun H; Yuan L; Steinmetz LM; Li Y; Yang H
Science; 2019 Apr; 364(6437):289-292. PubMed ID: 30819928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenine base editor engineering reduces editing of bystander cytosines.
Jeong YK; Lee S; Hwang GH; Hong SA; Park SE; Kim JS; Woo JS; Bae S
Nat Biotechnol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 34211162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Engineering domain-inlaid SaCas9 adenine base editors with reduced RNA off-targets and increased on-target DNA editing.
Nguyen Tran MT; Mohd Khalid MKN; Wang Q; Walker JKR; Lidgerwood GE; Dilworth KL; Lisowski L; Pébay A; Hewitt AW
Nat Commun; 2020 Sep; 11(1):4871. PubMed ID: 32978399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Base editing and prime editing in laboratory animals.
Caso F; Davies B
Lab Anim; 2022 Feb; 56(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 33596731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dual-deaminase CRISPR base editor enables concurrent adenine and cytosine editing.
Grünewald J; Zhou R; Lareau CA; Garcia SP; Iyer S; Miller BR; Langner LM; Hsu JY; Aryee MJ; Joung JK
Nat Biotechnol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):861-864. PubMed ID: 32483364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
