These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35286441)
1. The COVID-19 pandemic and upgrades of CI speech processors for children: part II-hearing outcomes. Obrycka A; Lorens A; Walkowiak A; Wlodarczyk E; Dziendziel B; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 279(10):4815-4823. PubMed ID: 35286441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The COVID-19 pandemic and upgrades of CI speech processors for children: part I-procedure of speech processor upgrade. Obrycka A; Lorens A; Walkowiak A; Wlodarczyk E; Dziendziel B; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 279(10):4809-4813. PubMed ID: 35217905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users. Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear Implant Single-Unit Audio Processors in Young Children. Saleh S; Almuhawas F; Alradhi A; Alhabib SF; Alzhrani F; Hagr A J Int Adv Otol; 2023 Nov; 19(6):447-453. PubMed ID: 38088315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor. Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants. Lailach S; Lenz A; Zahnert T; Neudert M HNO; 2024 Jan; 72(Suppl 1):25-32. PubMed ID: 37656221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants. German version]. Lailach S; Lenz A; Zahnert T; Neudert M HNO; 2023 Sep; 71(9):583-591. PubMed ID: 37540233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor. Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception in noise and sound localization using different microphone modes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant users. Müller V; Krause J; Klünter HD; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 May; 156():111117. PubMed ID: 35366421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants. Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system. Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors. Dazert S; Thomas JP; Büchner A; Müller J; Hempel JM; Löwenheim H; Mlynski R Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 27909888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exposure to Spoken Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Children With Cochlear Implants. Wener E; Booth L; Bensky H; Desai V; Negandhi J; Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Oct; 6(10):e2339042. PubMed ID: 37889489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation. Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Processors. Pinheiro MMC; Mancini PC; Soares AD; Ribas Â; Lima DP; Cavadas M; Banhara MR; Carvalho SADS; Buzo BC J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jul; 32(7):469-476. PubMed ID: 34847587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits in noise from sound processor upgrade in thirty-three cochlear implant users for more than 20 years. Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Nguyen Y; Lahlou G Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 278(3):827-831. PubMed ID: 32588171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of upgrading to the Nucleus Todorov MJ; Galvin KL Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 29566583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]