These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35287485)

  • 21. [The future of laparoscopy and robotics in urology].
    Rassweiler J; Goezen AS; Klein JT; Rassweiler-Seyfried MC
    Aktuelle Urol; 2018 Dec; 49(6):488-499. PubMed ID: 30522159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopy & robotics: a historical parallel.
    Nacul MP
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2020; 47():e20202811. PubMed ID: 33237185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Magrina JF; Cetta RL; Chang YH; Guevara G; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 23357611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
    Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and recurrence with laparoscopy, vaginal/laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Magrina JF; Zanagnolo V; Giles D; Noble BN; Kho RM; Magtibay PM
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2011; 32(5):476-80. PubMed ID: 22053656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy on skill acquisition and performance.
    Kho RM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 21857168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics.
    Nezhat F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S29-32. PubMed ID: 18762326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Current status of robotics in urologic laparoscopy.
    Gettman MT; Blute ML; Peschel R; Bartsch G
    Eur Urol; 2003 Feb; 43(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12565766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
    Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Laparoscopy and robotics].
    Tanović H; Mesihović R
    Med Arh; 2004; 58(1 Suppl 2):117-8. PubMed ID: 15137224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotics vs Laparoscopy-Are They Truly Rivals?
    Liu N; Greenberg JA
    JAMA Surg; 2020 May; 155(5):388. PubMed ID: 32186658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic adnexectomy compared with laparoscopy for adnexal mass.
    Magrina JF; Espada M; Munoz R; Noble BN; Kho RMC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):581-584. PubMed ID: 19701038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotics, technology, and the future of surgery.
    Kavic MS
    JSLS; 2000; 4(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 11051184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
    Advincula AP; Wang K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 19423061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meaningful comparison of robotics versus laparoscopy for nephron-sparing surgery: no contest or no dice?
    Corcoran AT; Kutikov A; Uzzo RG
    Eur Urol; 2012 Dec; 62(6):1037-8; discussion 1038-9. PubMed ID: 22854246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopy or robotics: where does the future lie?
    Patil K; Kirby R; Hicks J; Stolzenburg JU
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1551-3. PubMed ID: 19793382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic skill acquisition: implications for training.
    Obek C; Hubka M; Porter M; Chang L; Porter JR
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16283847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL evaluation.
    Mottrie A; Ficarra V
    Eur Urol; 2010 Oct; 58(4):525-7. PubMed ID: 20705390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Potential pitfalls of the rapid uptake of new technology in surgery: can comparative effectiveness research help?
    Leitao MM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Mar; 30(8):767-9. PubMed ID: 22291075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The emerging role of robotics and laparoscopy in stone disease.
    Humphreys MR
    Urol Clin North Am; 2013 Feb; 40(1):115-28. PubMed ID: 23177639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.