These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35288314)

  • 1. The impact of sampling frequency on ground reaction force variables.
    Renner KE; Peebles AT; Socha JJ; Queen RM
    J Biomech; 2022 Apr; 135():111034. PubMed ID: 35288314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral Squatting Mechanics Are Associated With Landing Mechanics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients.
    Peebles AT; Williams B; Queen RM
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Aug; 49(10):2638-2644. PubMed ID: 34236927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peak knee biomechanics and limb symmetry following unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Associations of walking gait and jump-landing outcomes.
    Pfeiffer SJ; Blackburn JT; Luc-Harkey B; Harkey MS; Stanley LE; Frank B; Padua D; Marshall SW; Spang JT; Pietrosimone B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2018 Mar; 53():79-85. PubMed ID: 29471191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sacral acceleration can predict whole-body kinetics and stride kinematics across running speeds.
    Alcantara RS; Day EM; Hahn ME; Grabowski AM
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11199. PubMed ID: 33954039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A subsequent movement alters lower extremity muscle activity and kinetics in drop jumps vs. drop landings.
    Ambegaonkar JP; Shultz SJ; Perrin DH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Oct; 25(10):2781-8. PubMed ID: 21873898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landing biomechanics deficits in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients can be assessed in a non-laboratory setting.
    Peebles AT; Miller TK; Queen RM
    J Orthop Res; 2022 Jan; 40(1):150-158. PubMed ID: 33738820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Running ground reaction forces across footwear conditions are predicted from the motion of two body mass components.
    Udofa AB; Clark KP; Ryan LJ; Weyand PG
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 May; 126(5):1315-1325. PubMed ID: 30763160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of age and gender differences in walking using mobile wearable sensors.
    Renner K; Queen R
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jun; 87():59-64. PubMed ID: 33892393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of standardized footwear on load and load symmetry.
    Luftglass AR; Peebles AT; Miller TK; Queen RM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2021 Aug; 88():105421. PubMed ID: 34246037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Landing Kinematics and Kinetics at the Knee During Different Landing Tasks.
    Heebner NR; Rafferty DM; Wohleber MF; Simonson AJ; Lovalekar M; Reinert A; Sell TC
    J Athl Train; 2017 Dec; 52(12):1101-1108. PubMed ID: 29154692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of pressure insole sampling frequency on insole-measured peak force accuracy during running.
    Elstub LJ; Grohowski LM; Wolf DN; Owen MK; Noehren B; Zelik KE
    J Biomech; 2022 Dec; 145():111387. PubMed ID: 36442432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the Justifications for Selecting a Drop Landing Task to Assess Injury Biomechanics: A Narrative Review and Analysis of Landings Performed by Female Netball Players.
    Collings TJ; Gorman AD; Stuelcken MC; Mellifont DB; Sayers MGL
    Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 49(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 30684242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relation between peak knee flexion angle and knee ankle kinetics in single-leg jump landing from running: a pilot study on male handball players to prevent ACL injury.
    Ameer MA; Muaidi QI
    Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Sep; 45(3):337-343. PubMed ID: 28628348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A normative database of hip and knee joint biomechanics during dynamic tasks using anatomical regression prediction methods.
    Bennett HJ; Fleenor K; Weinhandl JT
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():122-131. PubMed ID: 30348448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol
    Renner KE; Williams DSB; Queen RM
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 30641910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing differences in the generation of ground reaction forces between the initial and secondary landing phases of the drop vertical jump.
    Bates NA; Ford KR; Myer GD; Hewett TE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2013 Aug; 28(7):796-9. PubMed ID: 23899938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing of a tri-instrumented-treadmill unit for kinetic analysis of locomotion tasks in static and dynamic loading conditions.
    Paolini G; Della Croce U; Riley PO; Newton FK; Casey Kerrigan D
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Apr; 29(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 16759895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of sampling frequency on fractal fluctuations during treadmill walking.
    Marmelat V; Duncan A; Meltz S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0218908. PubMed ID: 31697684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical ground reaction forces during gait in children with and without calcaneal apophysitis.
    McSweeney S; Reed LF; Wearing SC
    Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():126-130. PubMed ID: 31054494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do accelerometers mounted on the back provide a good estimate of impact loads in jumping and landing tasks?
    Simons C; Bradshaw EJ
    Sports Biomech; 2016; 15(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 26873303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.