222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35288504)
21. Management of the Repeatedly Failed Cranioplasty Following Large Postdecompressive Craniectomy: Establishing the Efficacy of Staged Free Latissimus Dorsi Transfer/Tissue Expansion/Custom Polyetheretherketone Implant Reconstruction.
Mundinger GS; Latham K; Friedrich J; Louie O; Said H; Birgfeld C; Ellenbogen R; Hopper RA
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):1971-1977. PubMed ID: 28005736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Complex skull defects reconstruction with САD/САМ titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants.
Eolchiyan SA
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2014; 78(4):3-13. PubMed ID: 25406805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative analysis of dual-purpose, patient-specific craniofacial implants for correction of temporal deformity.
Zhong S; Huang GJ; Susarla SM; Swanson EW; Huang J; Gordon CR
Neurosurgery; 2015 Jun; 11 Suppl 2():220-9; discussion 229. PubMed ID: 25710104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computer-Guided In-House Cranioplasty: Establishing a Novel Standard for Cranial Reconstruction and Proposal of an Updated Protocol.
Tel A; Tuniz F; Fabbro S; Sembronio S; Costa F; Robiony M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 78(12):2297.e1-2297.e16. PubMed ID: 32898484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The "springform" technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants.
Pöppe JP; Spendel M; Schwartz C; Winkler PA; Wittig J
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Mar; 164(3):679-688. PubMed ID: 34873659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population.
Fu KJ; Barr RM; Kerr ML; Shah MN; Fletcher SA; Sandberg DI; Teichgraeber JF; Greives MR
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 27035597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Customized Polymethylmethacrylate Cranioplasty Implants Using 3-Dimensional Printed Polylactic Acid Molds: Technical Note with 2 Illustrative Cases.
Abdel Hay J; Smayra T; Moussa R
World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():971-979.e1. PubMed ID: 28502686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Next-generation personalized cranioplasty treatment.
Thimukonda Jegadeesan J; Baldia M; Basu B
Acta Biomater; 2022 Dec; 154():63-82. PubMed ID: 36272686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
Asaad M; Taslakian EN; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Bite U; Mardini S; Van Gompel JJ; Sharaf B
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Customised fabricated implants after previous failed cranioplasty.
Goh RC; Chang CN; Lin CL; Lo LJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Sep; 63(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 19766072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cranioplasty: Review of Materials.
Zanotti B; Zingaretti N; Verlicchi A; Robiony M; Alfieri A; Parodi PC
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):2061-2072. PubMed ID: 28005754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Synchronized "One-Step" Resection and Cranio-Orbital Reconstruction for Spheno-Orbital Lesions With Custom Made Implant.
Bassi M; Antonelli V; Tomassini A; Maimone G; D'Andrea M; Campobassi A; Gessaroli M; Tosatto L
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 32(5):1870-1873. PubMed ID: 33534310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical Decision-Making in Microvascular Reconstruction of Composite Scalp and Skull Defects.
Vargo JD; Przylecki W; Andrews BT
J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 31(7):1895-1899. PubMed ID: 32604312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reconstruction of cranioplasty using medpor porouspolyethylene implant.
Marlier B; Kleiber JC; Bannwarth M; Theret E; Eap C; Litre CF
Neurochirurgie; 2017 Dec; 63(6):468-472. PubMed ID: 29122305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The application of rapid prototyping techniques in cranial reconstruction and preoperative planning in neurosurgery.
Müller A; Krishnan KG; Uhl E; Mast G
J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):899-914. PubMed ID: 14600634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Usefulness of an Osteotomy Template for Skull Tumorectomy and Simultaneous Skull Reconstruction.
Oji T; Sakamoto Y; Miwa T; Nakagawa Y; Yoshida K; Kishi K
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 27(6):1565-7. PubMed ID: 27391660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes of Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty in Pediatric Patients.
Ma IT; Symon MR; Bristol RE; Beals SP; Joganic EF; Adelson PD; Shafron DH; Singh DJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29049146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-Effective Technique of Fabrication of Polymethyl Methacrylate Based Cranial Implant Using Three-Dimensional Printed Moulds and Wax Elimination Technique.
Desai JB
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 30(4):1259-1263. PubMed ID: 30950944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.
Anchieta MV; Salles FA; Cassaro BD; Quaresma MM; Santos BF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1919-25. PubMed ID: 27167515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]