These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35288895)
1. Clinical practice standards for colonoscopy. Hammami A; Elloumi H; Bouali R; Elloumi H Tunis Med; 2021 Octobre; 99(10):952-960. PubMed ID: 35288895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be? Hancock KS; Mascarenhas R; Lieberman D Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2016 Jun; 18(6):27. PubMed ID: 27098814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What are the priority quality indicators for colonoscopy in real-world clinical practice? Tiankanon K; Aniwan S Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 37422906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality measures improving endoscopic screening of colorectal cancer: a review of the literature. Maida M; Morreale G; Sinagra E; Ianiro G; Margherita V; Cirrone Cipolla A; Camilleri S Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2019 Mar; 19(3):223-235. PubMed ID: 30614284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit. Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats. Pullens HJ; Siersema PD World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 6(12):571-83. PubMed ID: 25512766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication. Mangas-Sanjuan C; Santana E; Cubiella J; Rodríguez-Camacho E; Seoane A; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Suárez A; Álvarez-García V; González N; Luè A; Cid-Gomez L; Ponce M; Bujanda L; Portillo I; Pellisé M; Díez-Redondo P; Herráiz M; Ono A; Pizarro Á; Zapater P; Jover R; Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 May; 18(5):1216-1223.e2. PubMed ID: 31446179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-definition colonoscopy with i-Scan: better diagnosis for small polyps and flat adenomas. Testoni PA; Notaristefano C; Vailati C; Di Leo M; Viale E World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5231-9. PubMed ID: 23066318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. Beaulieu D; Barkun A; Martel M World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(27):3551-7. PubMed ID: 22826619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate. Buerger M; Kasper P; Allo G; Gillessen J; Schramm C BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 31730463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy. Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality indicators for colonoscopy in a Tunisian endoscopy unit. Ennaifer R; Elleuch N; Sabbagh S; Romdhane H; Hefaiedh R; Ben Nejma H; Belhadj N Tunis Med; 2015 Mar; 93(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 26367400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colonoscopy quality assessment. Morán Sánchez S; Torrella E; Esteban Delgado P; Baños Madrid R; García A; Ono A; Pérez Cuadrado E; Parra P; Cruzado Quevedo J; Pérez Riquelme F; Carballo Alvarez F Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2009 Feb; 101(2):107-12, 112-6. PubMed ID: 19335046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome. Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M; Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study. Kushnir VM; Oh YS; Hollander T; Chen CH; Sayuk GS; Davidson N; Mullady D; Murad FM; Sharabash NM; Ruettgers E; Dassopoulos T; Easler JJ; Gyawali CP; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 110(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25732415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]