These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35289946)

  • 21. Commentary on the regulatory implications of noise-induced cochlear neuropathy.
    Dobie RA; Humes LE
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):74-78. PubMed ID: 27849127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnosis and quantification of military noise-induced hearing loss.
    Moore BCJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):884. PubMed ID: 32873002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applying Kurtosis as an Indirect Metric of Noise Temporal Structure in the Assessment of Hearing Loss Associated With Occupational Complex Noise Exposure.
    Zhang M; Qiu W; Xie H; Xu X; Shi Z; Gao X; Zhou L; Zou H; Hu W; Sun X
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1782-1796. PubMed ID: 34369415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do hearing protectors protect hearing?
    Groenewold MR; Masterson EA; Themann CL; Davis RR
    Am J Ind Med; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1001-10. PubMed ID: 24700499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Occupational Noise Exposure and Longitudinal Hearing Changes in Post-9/11 US Military Personnel During an Initial Period of Military Service.
    Reavis KM; McMillan GP; Carlson KF; Joseph AR; Snowden JM; Griest S; Henry JA
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1163-1172. PubMed ID: 33974789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine in prevention of noise induced hearing loss: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kopke R; Slade MD; Jackson R; Hammill T; Fausti S; Lonsbury-Martin B; Sanderson A; Dreisbach L; Rabinowitz P; Torre P; Balough B
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():40-50. PubMed ID: 25620313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High-frequency audiometry: a means for early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Mehrparvar AH; Mirmohammadi SJ; Ghoreyshi A; Mollasadeghi A; Loukzadeh Z
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(55):402-6. PubMed ID: 22122956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of noise level and seniority in the workplace on the SAL, ELI and percentage of hearing loss indices in the diagnosis and prevention of hearing loss in the working population.
    Barrero JP; García-Herrero S; Mariscal MA
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():428-440. PubMed ID: 35249624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Occupational hearing loss: new diagnostic opportunities].
    Sułkowski WJ; Guzek WJ; Kowalska S; Matyja W; Sward-Matyja M
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(6):457-9. PubMed ID: 12701535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Effects on hearing due to the occupational noise exposure of marble industry workers in the Federal District, Brazil].
    Harger MR; Barbosa-Branco A
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2004; 50(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 15666020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.
    Mirza R; Kirchner DB; Dobie RA; Crawford J;
    J Occup Environ Med; 2018 Sep; 60(9):e498-e501. PubMed ID: 30095587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Occupational noise exposure, hearing loss, and notched audiograms in the HUNT Nord-Trøndelag hearing loss study, 1996-1998.
    Lie A; Engdahl B; Hoffman HJ; Li CM; Tambs K
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1442-1450. PubMed ID: 27696439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data.
    Adera T; Donahue AM; Malit BD; Gaydos JC
    Mil Med; 1993 Nov; 158(11):698-701. PubMed ID: 8284053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changes over time in audiometric thresholds in a group of automobile stamping and assembly workers with a hearing conservation program.
    Brink LL; Talbott EO; Burks JA; Palmer CV
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2002; 63(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 12486782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tracking occupational hearing loss across global industries: a comparative analysis of metrics.
    Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; McTague MF; Slade MD; Wesdock JC; Dixon-Ernst C
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(56):21-7. PubMed ID: 22387709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Program for hearing loss prevention in four metallurgical factories in Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil].
    Gonçalves CG; Iguti AM
    Cad Saude Publica; 2006 Mar; 22(3):609-18. PubMed ID: 16583105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative assessment of shift in hearing threshold among handicraft operatives in India.
    Singh AK
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jan; 62(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 30442078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Specific effects upon hearing due to occupational noise].
    Carp CM; Dinu C
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 19292087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noise dosimetry for tactical environments.
    Smalt CJ; Lacirignola J; Davis SK; Calamia PT; Collins PP
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():42-54. PubMed ID: 27876480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing conservation in mining.
    McBride DI
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 15289584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.