These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35290165)

  • 1. The French MBAA2 sentence recognition in noise test for cochlear implant users.
    James CJ; Laborde ML; Algans C; Tartayre M; Cochard N; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Marx M; Karoui C
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):304-311. PubMed ID: 35290165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and Evaluation of a Language-Independent Test of Auditory Discrimination for Referrals for Cochlear Implant Candidacy Assessment.
    Ching TYC; Dillon H; Hou S; Seeto M; Sodan A; Chong-White N
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 34812793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.
    King SE; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Strube M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):313-31. PubMed ID: 22533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening Effort Measured With Pupillometry in Cochlear Implant Users Depends on Sound Level, But Not on the Signal to Noise Ratio When Using the Matrix Test.
    Stronks HC; Tops AL; Quach KW; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 38886888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Lenarz T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():80-7. PubMed ID: 26364512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intonational cues for speech perception in noise by cochlear implant listeners.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 277(12):3315-3321. PubMed ID: 32444968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):817-28. PubMed ID: 24975235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Cook SJ; Loiselle LM; DeJong MD; Hedley-Williams A; Sunderhaus LS; Hayes CA; Gifford RH
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 24658601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.
    Faulkner KF; Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):582-94. PubMed ID: 26134725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AzBio Sentence test in Hebrew (HeBio): development, preliminary validation, and the effect of noise.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Dahan T; Katzenel U; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Fostick L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Sep; 23(5):270-279. PubMed ID: 35672886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voice Discrimination in Quiet and in Background Noise by Simulated and Real Cochlear Implant Users.
    Levin M; Zaltz Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Dec; 66(12):5169-5186. PubMed ID: 37992412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and Validation of the Spanish AzBio Sentence Corpus.
    Rivas A; Perkins E; Rivas A; Rincon LA; Litvak L; Spahr T; Dorman M; Kessler D; Gifford R
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):154-158. PubMed ID: 33885261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.