These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35290584)

  • 21. The impact of subsidy and preferential tax policies on mobile phone recycling: A system dynamics model analysis.
    Wang G; Yuan M; Xu H
    Waste Manag; 2022 Oct; 152():6-16. PubMed ID: 35964401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Research on the Evolutionary Game of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) Recycling Units' Green Behavior, Considering Remanufacturing Capability.
    Li X; Huang R; Dai J; Li J; Shen Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling.
    Islam R; Nazifa TH; Yuniarto A; Shanawaz Uddin ASM; Salmiati S; Shahid S
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():10-21. PubMed ID: 31351595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making.
    Di Maria A; Eyckmans J; Van Acker K
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():3-21. PubMed ID: 29398268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Challenges in current construction and demolition waste recycling: A China study.
    Ma M; Tam VWY; Le KN; Li W
    Waste Manag; 2020 Dec; 118():610-625. PubMed ID: 33010692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulating the Effect of Mixed Subsidy Policies on Urban Low-Value Recyclable Waste in China: A System Dynamics Approach.
    Sun D; Xie D; Jiang P; Xie J; Xu Y; Ren Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exploring the restrictive factors for the development of the construction waste recycling industry in a second-tier Chinese city: a case study from Jinan.
    Wei Y; Zhang L; Sang P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46394-46413. PubMed ID: 36719585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Economic benefit analysis of the carbon potential of construction waste resource management based on a simulation of carbon trading policy.
    Liu J; Li J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(36):85986-86009. PubMed ID: 37395881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste estimation and planning.
    Cheng JC; Ma LY
    Waste Manag; 2013 Jun; 33(6):1539-51. PubMed ID: 23490358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Building a whole process policy framework promoting construction and demolition waste utilization in China.
    Wang Q; Jiang T; Liu L; Zhang S; Kildunne A; Miao Z
    Waste Manag Res; 2023 Apr; 41(4):914-923. PubMed ID: 36245415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technology adoption path of construction and demolition waste recycling under governmental subsidy: a theoretical model.
    Hua C; Chen L; Liu C; Chen J; Yang C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(25):67880-67890. PubMed ID: 37120497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evolutionary game model of construction enterprises and construction material manufacturers in the construction and demolition waste resource utilization.
    Shao Z; Li M; Han C; Meng L
    Waste Manag Res; 2023 Feb; 41(2):477-495. PubMed ID: 36134682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
    Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Construction and demolition waste management in Australia: A mini-review.
    Zhao X; Webber R; Kalutara P; Browne W; Pienaar J
    Waste Manag Res; 2022 Jan; 40(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 34218724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determinants Affecting Purchase Willingness of Contractors towards Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Products: An Empirical Study in Shenzhen, China.
    Yu B; Wang J; Liao Y; Wu H; Wong AB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33919278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Willingness to pay for construction and demolition waste from buildings in Chile.
    Véliz KD; Ramírez-Rodríguez G; Ossio F
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jan; 137():222-230. PubMed ID: 34800746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the performance and intellectual structure of construction and demolition waste research during 2000-2016.
    Liu Y; Sun T; Yang L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug; 24(23):19259-19266. PubMed ID: 28667584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distribution of materials in construction and demolition waste in Portugal.
    Coelho A; de Brito J
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Aug; 29(8):843-53. PubMed ID: 20498131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of Recycler Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance of Construction and Demolition Waste Resource Utilization.
    Zheng H; Li X; Zhu X; Huang Y; Liu Z; Liu Y; Liu J; Li X; Li Y; Li C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Overview regarding construction and demolition waste in Spain.
    Rodríguez-Robles D; García-González J; Juan-Valdés A; Morán-Del Pozo JM; Guerra-Romero MI
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(23):3060-70. PubMed ID: 25230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.