160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35290633)
1. Studying Single-Stranded DNA Gaps at Replication Intermediates by Electron Microscopy.
Jackson J; Vindigni A
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2444():81-103. PubMed ID: 35290633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic Architecture of Eukaryotic DNA Replication Forks In Vivo, Visualized by Electron Microscopy.
Zellweger R; Lopes M
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1672():261-294. PubMed ID: 29043630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visualization and interpretation of eukaryotic DNA replication intermediates in vivo by electron microscopy.
Neelsen KJ; Chaudhuri AR; Follonier C; Herrador R; Lopes M
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1094():177-208. PubMed ID: 24162989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA Fiber Analysis: Mind the Gap!
Quinet A; Carvajal-Maldonado D; Lemacon D; Vindigni A
Methods Enzymol; 2017; 591():55-82. PubMed ID: 28645379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replication of simian virus 40 DNA after UV irradiation: evidence of growing fork blockage and single-stranded gaps in daughter strands.
Mezzina M; Menck CF; Courtin P; Sarasin A
J Virol; 1988 Nov; 62(11):4249-58. PubMed ID: 2845136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A rapid method to visualize human mitochondrial DNA replication through rotary shadowing and transmission electron microscopy.
Kosar M; Piccini D; Foiani M; Giannattasio M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Dec; 49(21):e121. PubMed ID: 34500456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.
Sogo JM; Lopes M; Foiani M
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5581):599-602. PubMed ID: 12142537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electron microscopy methods for studying in vivo DNA replication intermediates.
Lopes M
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 521():605-31. PubMed ID: 19563131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Post-Replicative Gaps Accumulation and Repair in Human Cells Using the DNA Fiber Assay.
Martins DJ; Tirman S; Quinet A; Menck CFM
J Vis Exp; 2022 Feb; (180):. PubMed ID: 35188138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions.
Lopes M; Foiani M; Sogo JM
Mol Cell; 2006 Jan; 21(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 16387650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining electron microscopy with single molecule DNA fiber approaches to study DNA replication dynamics.
Vindigni A; Lopes M
Biophys Chem; 2017 Jun; 225():3-9. PubMed ID: 27939387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Replication fork reversal occurs spontaneously after digestion but is constrained in supercoiled domains.
Fierro-Fernández M; Hernández P; Krimer DB; Schvartzman JB
J Biol Chem; 2007 Jun; 282(25):18190-18196. PubMed ID: 17456472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells.
Cotta-Ramusino C; Fachinetti D; Lucca C; Doksani Y; Lopes M; Sogo J; Foiani M
Mol Cell; 2005 Jan; 17(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 15629726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To skip or not to skip: choosing repriming to tolerate DNA damage.
Quinet A; Tirman S; Cybulla E; Meroni A; Vindigni A
Mol Cell; 2021 Feb; 81(4):649-658. PubMed ID: 33515486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PRIMPOL-Mediated Adaptive Response Suppresses Replication Fork Reversal in BRCA-Deficient Cells.
Quinet A; Tirman S; Jackson J; Šviković S; Lemaçon D; Carvajal-Maldonado D; González-Acosta D; Vessoni AT; Cybulla E; Wood M; Tavis S; Batista LFZ; Méndez J; Sale JE; Vindigni A
Mol Cell; 2020 Feb; 77(3):461-474.e9. PubMed ID: 31676232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing Single-Stranded DNA during Replication Stress in Fission Yeast.
Sabatinos SA; Forsburg SL
Biomolecules; 2015 Sep; 5(3):2123-39. PubMed ID: 26393661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RADX prevents genome instability by confining replication fork reversal to stalled forks.
Krishnamoorthy A; Jackson J; Mohamed T; Adolph M; Vindigni A; Cortez D
Mol Cell; 2021 Jul; 81(14):3007-3017.e5. PubMed ID: 34107305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The UL8 subunit of the helicase-primase complex of herpes simplex virus promotes DNA annealing and has a high affinity for replication forks.
Bermek O; Weller SK; Griffith JD
J Biol Chem; 2017 Sep; 292(38):15611-15621. PubMed ID: 28743747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing CMG helicase and CMG-dependent replication assays by designing DNA fork substrates and choosing nucleotide analogues for helicase preloading.
Yao NY; O'Donnell ME
Methods Enzymol; 2022; 672():173-202. PubMed ID: 35934475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AND-1 fork protection function prevents fork resection and is essential for proliferation.
Abe T; Kawasumi R; Giannattasio M; Dusi S; Yoshimoto Y; Miyata K; Umemura K; Hirota K; Branzei D
Nat Commun; 2018 Aug; 9(1):3091. PubMed ID: 30082684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
