BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35293085)

  • 1. Evaluation of a novel medical device for pegfilgrastim administration.
    Aruga T; Doihara H; Yanagita Y; Ishida T; Yamashita T; Uehara K; Taira T; Tsurutani J; Takeshita T; Tsuyuki S; Kaneko K; Ohtake T; Yamaguchi Y; Hara Y; Saji S
    Cancer Sci; 2022 May; 113(5):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 35293085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?
    De Oliveira Brandao C; Lewis S; Sandschafer D; Crawford J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 May; 39(5):707-718. PubMed ID: 36976784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis.
    Mahtani RL; Belani R; Crawford J; Dale D; DeCosta L; Gawade PL; Huynh C; Lawrence T; Lewis S; MacLaughlin WW; Narang M; Rifkin R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6135-6144. PubMed ID: 35426046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
    Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of eflapegrastim to pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (RECOVER): A Phase 3 study.
    Cobb PW; Moon YW; Mezei K; Láng I; Bhat G; Chawla S; Hasal SJ; Schwartzberg LS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6234-6243. PubMed ID: 32687266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pilot study on intermittent every other days of 5-dose Filgrastim compared with single Pegfilgrastim in breast Cancer patients receiving adjuvant Docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) chemotherapy.
    Sohn BS; Jeong JH; Ahn JH; Jung KH; Kim JE; Sohn JH; Koh SJ; Seo JH; Lee KS; Kim SB
    Invest New Drugs; 2020 Jun; 38(3):866-873. PubMed ID: 31728715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase III placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of pegfilgrastim to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.
    Kosaka Y; Rai Y; Masuda N; Takano T; Saeki T; Nakamura S; Shimazaki R; Ito Y; Tokuda Y; Tamura K
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Apr; 23(4):1137-43. PubMed ID: 25576433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients.
    Metz M; Semsek D; Rogmans G; Hutzschenreuter U; Fietz T; Harde J; Zacharias S; Hielscher C; Lorenz A; Zahn MO; Guth D; Liebers S; Berghorn M; Grebhardt S; Matillon CD; Egerer G; Potthoff K
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Nov; 29(11):6633-6643. PubMed ID: 33956213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified filgrastim regimen does not reduce pain burden compared to pegfilgrastim in women receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer.
    Leung M; Florendo J; Kano J; Marr-Del Monte T; Higgins B; Myers R; Menon T; Jones G
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Jun; 23(6):1669-77. PubMed ID: 25421443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Randomized, Open-Label Study Conducted to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv On-Body Injector Versus Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Male Participants.
    Tang H; Civoli F; Tatarewicz S; Vandenkoornhuyse N; Finck B
    Adv Ther; 2024 Mar; 41(3):991-1009. PubMed ID: 38180721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemotherapy-associated treatment burden in breast cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: secondary efficacy data from a phase III study.
    Gladkov OA; Buchner A; Bias P; Müller U; Elsässer R
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):395-400. PubMed ID: 26092233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conversion from pegfilgrastim with on-body injector to pegfilgrastim-jmdb: cost-efficiency analysis and budget-neutral expanded access to prophylaxis and treatment.
    McBride A; MacDonald K; Fuentes-Alburo A; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):598-606. PubMed ID: 33866947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
    Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Green MD; Koelbl H; Baselga J; Galid A; Guillem V; Gascon P; Siena S; Lalisang RI; Samonigg H; Clemens MR; Zani V; Liang BC; Renwick J; Piccart MJ;
    Ann Oncol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12488289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Pegfilgrastim On-body Injector in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Requiring Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support.
    Patel J; Rainess RA; Benfield MJ; Rogers KML; Moore DC; Larck C; Arnall JR
    Hosp Pharm; 2021 Apr; 56(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 33790481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of 3 mg versus 6 mg pegfilgrastim on the prevention of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide: a retrospective study.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Zhang J; Ye X; Liu H; Zhai Q; Yu B; Du Q
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 May; 10(5):5310-5315. PubMed ID: 33977742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.