These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35293310)

  • 1. DeepCAGE: Incorporating Transcription Factors in Genome-wide Prediction of Chromatin Accessibility.
    Liu Q; Hua K; Zhang X; Wong WH; Jiang R
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 20(3):496-507. PubMed ID: 35293310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chromatin accessibility prediction via a hybrid deep convolutional neural network.
    Liu Q; Xia F; Yin Q; Jiang R
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 34(5):732-738. PubMed ID: 29069282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. REUNION: transcription factor binding prediction and regulatory association inference from single-cell multi-omics data.
    Yang Y; Pe'er D
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Jun; 40(Suppl 1):i567-i575. PubMed ID: 38940155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
    Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of chromatin and transcriptional co-regulators in mediating p63-genome interactions in keratinocytes.
    Sethi I; Sinha S; Buck MJ
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):1042. PubMed ID: 25433490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ATAC-pipe: general analysis of genome-wide chromatin accessibility.
    Zuo Z; Jin Y; Zhang W; Lu Y; Li B; Qu K
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Sep; 20(5):1934-1943. PubMed ID: 29982337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome-Wide Measurement and Computational Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding and Chromatin Accessibility in Lymphocytes.
    Sadiyah MF; Roychoudhuri R
    Curr Protoc Immunol; 2019 Sep; 126(1):e84. PubMed ID: 31483104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Base-resolution prediction of transcription factor binding signals by a deep learning framework.
    Zhang Q; He Y; Wang S; Chen Z; Guo Z; Cui Z; Liu Q; Huang DS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1009941. PubMed ID: 35263332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data.
    Pique-Regi R; Degner JF; Pai AA; Gaffney DJ; Gilad Y; Pritchard JK
    Genome Res; 2011 Mar; 21(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 21106904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The functional consequences of variation in transcription factor binding.
    Cusanovich DA; Pavlovic B; Pritchard JK; Gilad Y
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Mar; 10(3):e1004226. PubMed ID: 24603674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Labelled regulatory elements are pervasive features of the macrophage genome and are dynamically utilized by classical and alternative polarization signals.
    Horvath A; Daniel B; Szeles L; Cuaranta-Monroy I; Czimmerer Z; Ozgyin L; Steiner L; Kiss M; Simandi Z; Poliska S; Giannakis N; Raineri E; Gut IG; Nagy B; Nagy L
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Apr; 47(6):2778-2792. PubMed ID: 30799488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mocap: large-scale inference of transcription factor binding sites from chromatin accessibility.
    Chen X; Yu B; Carriero N; Silva C; Bonneau R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 May; 45(8):4315-4329. PubMed ID: 28334916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrative prediction of gene expression with chromatin accessibility and conformation data.
    Schmidt F; Kern F; Schulz MH
    Epigenetics Chromatin; 2020 Feb; 13(1):4. PubMed ID: 32029002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting transcription factor site occupancy using DNA sequence intrinsic and cell-type specific chromatin features.
    Kumar S; Bucher P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4. PubMed ID: 26818008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast.
    Tsai ZT; Shiu SH; Tsai HK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004418. PubMed ID: 26291518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between histone modifications and transcription factor binding is protein family specific.
    Xin B; Rohs R
    Genome Res; 2018 Mar; 28(3):321-333. PubMed ID: 29326300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences.
    Greenside P; Shimko T; Fordyce P; Kundaje A
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):i629-i637. PubMed ID: 30423062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome accessibility is widely preserved and locally modulated during mitosis.
    Hsiung CC; Morrissey CS; Udugama M; Frank CL; Keller CA; Baek S; Giardine B; Crawford GE; Sung MH; Hardison RC; Blobel GA
    Genome Res; 2015 Feb; 25(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 25373146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting transcription factor binding motifs from DNA-binding domains, chromatin accessibility and gene expression data.
    Zamanighomi M; Lin Z; Wang Y; Jiang R; Wong WH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jun; 45(10):5666-5677. PubMed ID: 28472398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.