190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35295015)
1. Diagnostic performance of combined use of automated breast volume scanning & hand-held ultrasound for breast lesions.
Liu J; Zhou Y; Wu J; Li P; Liang X; Duan H; Wu X; Hou X; Li X
Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):347-354. PubMed ID: 35295015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning and hand- held ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer: an analysis of 5,566 patient evaluations.
Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(21):9101-5. PubMed ID: 25422185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) for monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients: preliminary results.
D'Angelo A; Rinaldi P; Belli P; D'Amico R; Carlino G; Grippo C; Giuliani M; Orlandi A; Infante A; Manfredi R
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Jan; 23(1):225-231. PubMed ID: 30657564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there an extraclinical value of automated breast volume scanner compared with hand-held ultrasound?: A pilot study.
Zhan J; Diao XH; Pang Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Chen Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e7765. PubMed ID: 28906361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic Breast Volume Scanner versus Handheld Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Wang L; Qi ZH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 31130410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner compared with a hand-held ultrasound: a meta-analysis.
Zhang X; Chen J; Zhou Y; Mao F; Lin Y; Shen S; Sun Q; Ouyang Z
Gland Surg; 2019 Dec; 8(6):698-711. PubMed ID: 32042678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination.
Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined use of the automated breast volume scanner and the US elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast.
Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Fu N; Huang P; Yang B
BMC Cancer; 2014 Nov; 14():798. PubMed ID: 25366878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening.
Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z
Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Diagnostic Significance of the BI-RADS Classification Combined With Automated Breast Volume Scanner and Shear Wave Elastography for Breast Lesions.
Ren T; Li X; Xiang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang M; Zhang C
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jul; 42(7):1459-1469. PubMed ID: 36534583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Automatic Breast Volume Scanner Compared to Handheld Ultrasound on Different Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review.
Ibraheem SA; Mahmud R; Mohamad Saini S; Abu Hassan H; Keiteb AS; Dirie AM
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35204629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
