BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35295016)

  • 1. Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern.
    Dhamija E; Baby A; Bhatla N; Pulappadi VP; Kumar M; Kumar S; Kumar L; Sharma D
    Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 35295016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastasis with
    Lin AJ; Wright JD; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Thaker PH; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1351-1354. PubMed ID: 31473660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy.
    Toita T; Nakano M; Higashi M; Sakumoto K; Kanazawa K
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):843-9. PubMed ID: 7591892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective study of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes positivity in stage 1A to 2A cervical cancer patients.
    John Lim BB; Yong CM
    Med J Malaysia; 2021 Jul; 76(4):534-540. PubMed ID: 34305115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False negative rate at
    Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nodal metastasis of cervix carcinoma- As a probable cause of bone erosion.
    Sethi S; Ramalingam V; Yadav M; Thulkar S
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(6):1260-1264. PubMed ID: 31898657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
    Ma R; Zhang H; Zou L; Qu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 25877610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
    Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
    Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
    Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study.
    Knoth J; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Fokdal L; Sturdza A; Hoskin P; Mahantshetty U; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Wiebe E; Rai B; Cooper R; van der Steen-Banasik E; van Limbergen E; Pieters BR; Sundset M; Tan LT; Nout RA; Tanderup K; Kirisits C; Nesvacil N; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 32798000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
    Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Value of CT scanning in the diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma].
    Dai JR; Zhang X; Jiang LX; Li J; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 28(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 16750026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
    Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
    Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FDG-PET lymph node staging and survival of patients with FIGO stage IIIb cervical carcinoma.
    Singh AK; Grigsby PW; Dehdashti F; Herzog TJ; Siegel BA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 12738325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain.
    Salvo G; Odetto D; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jun; 30(6):873-878. PubMed ID: 32241876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE).
    Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.